Practice Tests Plus 2 Academic Reading Test 4
3 passages · 40 questions · 60 minutes
Green virtues of green sand
[A] For the past 100 years special high grade white sand, dug from the ground at Leighton Buzzard in the UK, has been used to filter tap water to remove bacteria and impurities - but this may no longer be necessary. A new factory that turns used wine bottles into green sand could revolutionise the recycling industry and help to filter Britain's drinking water. Backed by $1.6m from the European Union and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), a company based in Scotland is building the factory, which will turn beverage bottles back into the sand from which they were made in the first place. The green sand has already been successfully tested by water companies and is being used in 50 swimming pools in Scotland to keep the water clean.
[B] The idea is not only to avoid using up an increasingly scarce natural resource, sand, but also to solve a crisis in the recycling industry. Britain uses 5.5m tonnes of glass a year, but recycles only 750,000 tonnes of it. The problem is that half the green bottle glass in Britain is originally from imported wine and beer bottles. Because there is so much of it, and it is used less in domestic production than other types, green glass is worth only $25 a tonne. Clear glass, which is melted down and used for whisky bottles, mainly for export, is worth double that amount.
[C] Howard Dryden, a scientist and managing director of the company, Dryden Aqua, of Bonnyrigg, near Edinburgh, has spent six years working on the product he calls Active Filtration Media, or AFM. He concedes that he has given what is basically recycled glass a 'fancy name' to remove the stigma of what most people would regard as an inferior product. He says he needs bottles that have already contained drinkable liquids to be sure that drinking water filtered through the AFM would not be contaminated. Crushed down beverage glass has fewer impurities than real sand and it performed better in trials. 'The fact is that tests show that AFM does the job better than sand, it is easier to clean and reuse and has all sorts of properties that make it ideal for other applications,' he claimed.
[D] The factory is designed to produce 100 tonnes of AFM a day, although Mr Dryden regards this as a large-scale pilot project rather than full production. Current estimates of the UK market for this glass for filtering drinking water, sewage, industrial water, swimming pools and fish farming are between 175,000 to 217,000 tonnes a year, which will use up most of the glass available near the factory. So he intends to build five or six factories in cities where there are large quantities of bottles, in order to cut down on transport costs.
[E] The current factory will be completed this month and is expected to go into full production on January 14th next year. Once it is providing a 'regular' product, the government's drinking water inspectorate will be asked to perform tests and approve it for widespread use by water companies. A Defra spokesman said it was hoped that AFM could meet approval within six months. The only problem that they could foresee was possible contamination if some glass came from sources other than beverage bottles.
[F] Among those who have tested the glass already is Caroline Fitzpatrick of the civil and environmental engineering department of University College London. 'We have looked at a number of batches and it appears to do the job,' she said. 'Basically, sand is made of glass and Mr Dryden is turning bottles back into sand. It seems a straightforward idea and there is no reason we can think of why it would not work. Since glass from wine bottles and other beverages has no impurities and clearly did not leach any substances into the contents of the bottles, there was no reason to believe there would be a problem,' Dr Fitzpatrick added.
[G] Mr Dryden has set up a network of agents round the world to sell AFM. It is already in use in central America to filter water on banana plantations where the fruit has to be washed before being despatched to European markets. It is also in use in sewage works to filter water before it is returned to rivers, something which is becoming legally necessary across the European Union because of tighter regulations on sewage works. So there are a great number of applications involving cleaning up water. Currently, however, AFM costs $670 a tonne, about four times as much as good quality sand. 'But that is because we haven't got large-scale production. Obviously, when we get going it will cost a lot less, and be competitive with sand in price as well,' Mr Dryden said. 'I believe it performs better and lasts longer than sand, so it is going to be better value too.'
[H] If AFM takes off as a product it will be a big boost for the government agency which is charged with finding a market for recycled products. Crushed glass is already being used in road surfacing and in making tiles and bricks. Similarly, AFM could prove to have a widespread use and give green glass a cash value.
Questions 1–10
Reading Passage 1 has eight paragraphs labelled A–H. Which paragraph contains the following information?
1. NB You may use any letter more than once. a description of plans to expand production of AFM
2. NB You may use any letter more than once. the identification of a potential danger in the raw material for AFM
3. NB You may use any letter more than once. an example of AFM use in the export market
4. NB You may use any letter more than once. a comparison of the value of green glass and other types of glass
5. NB You may use any letter more than once. a list of potential applications of AFM in the domestic market
6. NB You may use any letter more than once. the conclusions drawn from laboratory checks on the process of AFM production
7. NB You may use any letter more than once. identification of current funding for the production of green sand
8. NB You may use any letter more than once. an explanation of the chosen brand name for crushed green glass
9. NB You may use any letter more than once. a description of plans for exporting AFM
10. NB You may use any letter more than once. a description of what has to happen before AFM is accepted for general use
Questions 11–14
Complete the summary below. Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage for each answer.
11. The use of crushed green glass (AFM) may have two significant impacts: it may help to save a diminishing …………………………
12. while at the same time solving a major problem for the ………………………… in the UK.
13. However, according to Howard Dryden, only glass from bottles that have been used for ………………………… can be used in the production process.
14. AFM is more effective than ………………………… as a water filter, and also has other uses.
Coffee and chocolate
When scientists from London's Natural History Museum descended on the coffee farms of the tiny Central American republic of El Salvador, they were astonished to find such diversity of insect and plant species. During 18 months work on 12 farms, they found a third more species of parasitic wasp than are known to exist in the whole country of Costa Rica. They described four new species and are aware of a fifth. On 24 farms they found nearly 300 species of tree - when they had expected to find about 100.
El Salvador has lost much of its natural forest, with coffee farms covering nearly 10% of the country. Most of them use the 'shade-grown' method of production, which utilises a semi-natural forest ecosystem. Alex Munro, the museum's botanist on the expedition, says: 'Our findings amazed our insect specialist. There's a very sophisticated food web present. The wasps, for instance, may depend on specific species of tree.'
It's the same the world over. Species diversity is much higher where coffee is grown in shade conditions. In addition, coffee (and chocolate) is usually grown in tropical rainforest regions that are biodiversity hotspots. 'These habitats support up to 70% of the planet's plant and animal species, and so the production methods of cocoa and coffee can have a hugely significant impact,' explains Dr Paul Donald of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds.
So what does 'shade-grown' mean, and why is it good for wildlife? Most of the world's coffee is produced by poor farmers in the developing world. Traditionally they have grown coffee (and cocoa) under the shade of selectively thinned tracts of rain forest in a genuinely sustainable form of farming. Leaf fall from the canopy provides a supply of nutrients and acts as a mulch that suppresses weeds. The insects that live in the canopy pollinate the cocoa and coffee and prey on pests. The trees also provide farmers with fruit and wood for fuel.
'Bird diversity in shade-grown coffee plantations rivals that found in natural forests in the same region,' says Robert Rice from the Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center. In Ghana, West Africa, - one of the world's biggest producers of cocoa - 90% of the cocoa is grown under shade, and these forest plantations are a vital habitat for wintering European migrant birds. In the same way, the coffee forests of Central and South America are a refuge for wintering North American migrants.
More recently, a combination of the collapse in the world market for coffee and cocoa and a drive to increase yields by producer countries has led to huge swathes of shade-grown coffee and cocoa being cleared to make way for a highly intensive, monoculture pattern of production known as 'full sun'. But this system not only reduces the diversity of flora and fauna, it also requires huge amounts of pesticides and fertilisers. In Cote d'Ivoire, which produces more than half the world's cocoa, more than a third of the crop is now grown in full-sun conditions.
The loggers have been busy in the Americas too, where nearly 70% of all Colombian coffee is now produced using full-sun production. One study carried out in Colombia and Mexico found that, compared with shade coffee, full-sun plantations have 95% fewer species of birds.
In El Salvador, Alex Munro says shade-coffee farms have a cultural as well as ecological significance and people are not happy to see them go. But the financial pressures are great, and few of these coffee farms make much money. 'One farm we studied, a cooperative of 100 families, made just $10,000 a year - $100 per family - and that's not taking labour costs into account.'
The loss of shade-coffee forests has so alarmed a number of North American wildlife organisations that they're now harnessing consumer power to help save these threatened habitats. They are promoting a 'certification' system that can indicate to consumers that the beans have been grown on shade plantations. Bird-friendly coffee, for instance, is marketed by the Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center. The idea is that the small extra cost is passed directly on to the coffee farmers as a financial incentive to maintain their shade-coffee farms.
Not all conservationists agree with such measures, however. Some say certification could be leading to the loss - not preservation - of natural forests. John Rappole of the Smithsonian Conservation and Research Center, for example, argues that shade-grown marketing provides 'an incentive to convert existing areas of primary forest that are too remote or steep to be converted profitably to other forms of cultivation into shade-coffee plantations'.
Other conservationists, such as Stacey Philpott and colleagues, argue the case for shade coffee. But there are different types of shade growing. Those used by subsistence farmers are virtually identical to natural forest (and have a corresponding diversity), while systems that use coffee plants as the understorey and cacao or citrus trees as the overstorey may be no more diverse than full-sun farms. Certification procedures need to distinguish between the two, and Ms Philpott argues that as long as the process is rigorous and offers financial gains to the producers, shade growing does benefit the environment.
Questions 15–19
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 2?
TRUEif the statement agrees with the information
FALSEif the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVENif there is no information on this
15. Write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information, FALSE if the statement contradicts the information, or NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this. More species survive on the farms studied by the researchers than in the natural El Salvador forests.
16. Write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information, FALSE if the statement contradicts the information, or NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this. Nearly three-quarters of the Earth's wildlife species can be found in shade-coffee plantations.
17. Write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information, FALSE if the statement contradicts the information, or NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this. Farmers in El Salvador who have tried both methods prefer shade-grown plantations.
18. Write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information, FALSE if the statement contradicts the information, or NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this. Shade plantations are important for migrating birds in both Africa and the Americas.
19. Write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information, FALSE if the statement contradicts the information, or NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this. Full-sun cultivation can increase the costs of farming.
Questions 20–23
Look at the following opinions and the list of people below. Match each opinion to the person credited with it.
People
A Alex Munro
B Paul Donald
C Robert Rice
D John Rappole
E Stacey Philpott
20. NB You can write any letter more than once. Encouraging shade growing may lead to farmers using the natural forest for their plantations.
21. NB You can write any letter more than once. If shade-coffee farms match the right criteria, they can be good for wildlife.
22. NB You can write any letter more than once. There may be as many species of bird found on shade farms in a particular area, as in natural habitats there.
23. NB You can write any letter more than once. Currently, many shade-coffee farmers earn very little.
Questions 24–27
Classify the following features as applying to
Methods
A the shade-grown method
B the full-sun method
C both shade-grown and full-sun methods
24. A the shade-grown method B the full-sun method C both shade-grown and full-sun methods can be used on either coffee or cocoa plantations
25. A the shade-grown method B the full-sun method C both shade-grown and full-sun methods is expected to produce bigger crops
26. A the shade-grown method B the full-sun method C both shade-grown and full-sun methods documentation may be used to encourage sales
27. A the shade-grown method B the full-sun method C both shade-grown and full-sun methods can reduce wildlife diversity
Painters of time
[A] The works of Aboriginal artists are now much in demand throughout the world, and not just in Australia, where they are already fully recognised: the National Museum of Australia, which opened in Canberra in 2001, designated 40% of its exhibition space to works by Aborigines. In Europe their art is being exhibited at a museum in Lyon, France, while the future Quai Branly museum in Paris - which will be devoted to arts and civilisations of Africa, Asia, Oceania and the Americas - plans to commission frescoes by artists from Australia.
[B] Their artistic movement began about 30 years ago, but its roots go back to time immemorial. All the works refer to the founding myth of the Aboriginal culture, 'the Dreaming'. That internal geography, which is rendered with a brush and colours, is also the expression of the Aborigines' long quest to regain the land which was stolen from them when Europeans arrived in the nineteenth century. 'Painting is nothing without history,' says one such artist, Michael Nelson Tjakamarra.
[C] There are now fewer than 400,000 Aborigines living in Australia. They have been swamped by the country's 17.5 million immigrants. These original 'natives' have been living in Australia for 50,000 years, but they were undoubtedly maltreated by the newcomers. Driven back to the most barren lands or crammed into slums on the outskirts of cities, the Aborigines were subjected to a policy of 'assimilation', which involved kidnapping children to make them better 'integrated' into European society, and herding the nomadic Aborigines by force into settled communities.
[D] It was in one such community, Papunya, near Alice Springs, in the central desert, that Aboriginal painting first came into its own. In 1971, a white schoolteacher, Geoffrey Bardon, suggested to a group of Aborigines that they should decorate the school walls with ritual motifs, so as to pass on to the younger generation the myths that were starting to fade from their collective memory. He gave them brushes, colours and surfaces to paint on - cardboard and canvases. He was astounded by the result. But their art did not come like a bolt from the blue: for thousands of years Aborigines had been 'painting' on the ground using sands of different colours, and on rock faces. They had also been decorating their bodies for ceremonial purposes. So there existed a formal vocabulary.
[E] This had already been noted by Europeans. In the early twentieth century, Aboriginal communities brought together by missionaries in northern Australia had been encouraged to reproduce on tree bark the motifs found on rock faces. Artists turned out a steady stream of works, supported by the churches, which helped to sell them to the public, and between 1950 and 1960 Aboriginal paintings began to reach overseas museums. Painting on bark persisted in the north, whereas the communities in the central desert increasingly used acrylic paint, and elsewhere in Western Australia women explored the possibilities of wax painting and dyeing processes, known as 'batik'.
[F] What Aborigines depict are always elements of the Dreaming, the collective history that each community is both part of and guardian of. The Dreaming is the story of their origins, of their 'Great Ancestors', who passed on their knowledge, their art and their skills (hunting, medicine, painting, music and dance) to man. 'The Dreaming is not synonymous with the moment when the world was created,' says Stephane Jacob, one of the organisers of the Lyon exhibition. 'For Aborigines, that moment has never ceased to exist. It is perpetuated by the cycle of the seasons and the religious ceremonies which the Aborigines organise. Indeed the aim of those ceremonies is also to ensure the permanence of that golden age. The central function of Aboriginal painting, even in its contemporary manifestations, is to guarantee the survival of this world. The Dreaming is both past, present and future.'
[G] Each work is created individually, with a form peculiar to each artist, but it is created within and on behalf of a community who must approve it. An artist cannot use a 'dream' that does not belong to his or her community, since each community is the owner of its dreams, just as it is anchored to a territory marked out by its ancestors, so each painting can be interpreted as a kind of spiritual road map for that community.
[H] Nowadays, each community is organised as a cooperative and draws on the services of an art adviser, a government-employed agent who provides the artists with materials, deals with galleries and museums and redistributes the proceeds from sales among the artists. Today, Aboriginal painting has become a great success. Some works sell for more than $25,000, and exceptional items may fetch as much as $180,000 in Australia.
[I] 'By exporting their paintings as though they were surfaces of their territory, by accompanying them to the temples of western art, the Aborigines have redrawn the map of their country, into whose depths they were exiled,' says Yves Le Fur, of the Quai Branly museum. 'Masterpieces have been created. Their undeniable power prompts a dialogue that has proved all too rare in the history of contacts between the two cultures'.
Questions 28–33
Choose the correct heading for each paragraph from the list of headings below.
List of Headings:
i. Amazing results from a project
ii. New religious ceremonies
iii. Community art centres
iv. Early painting techniques and marketing systems
v. Mythology and history combined
vi. The increasing acclaim for Aboriginal art
vii. Belief in continuity
viii. Oppression of a minority people
28. Paragraph A:
29. Paragraph B:
30. Paragraph C:
31. Paragraph D:
32. Paragraph E:
33. Paragraph F:
Questions 34–37
Complete the flow chart below. Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the passage for each answer.
The history of Aboriginal painting techniques
For (34) …………………………, Aborigines produced ground and rock paintings.
↓
Early twentieth century: churches first promoted the use of (35) ………………………… for paintings.
↓
Mid-twentieth century: Aboriginal paintings were seen in (36) ………………………….
↓
Early 1970s: Aborigines painted traditional patterns on (37) ………………………… in one community.
Questions 38–40
Choose the correct answer, A, B, C or D.
38. In Paragraph G, the writer suggests that an important feature of Aboriginal art is
A its historical context.
B its significance to the group.
C its religious content.
D its message about the environment.
39. In Aboriginal beliefs, there is a significant relationship between
A communities and lifestyles.
B images and techniques.
C culture and form.
D ancestors and territory.
40. In Paragraph I, the writer suggests that Aboriginal art invites Westerners to engage with
A the Australian land.
B their own art.
C Aboriginal culture.
D their own history.
Answers
1. D
2. E
3. G
4. B
5. D
6. F
7. A
8. C
9. G
10. E
11. natural resource
12. recycling industry
13. drinkable liquids
14. real sand
15. Not Given
16. False
17. Not Given
18. True
19. True
20. D
21. E
22. C
23. A
24. C
25. B
26. A
27. B
28. vi
29. v
30. viii
31. i
32. iv
33. vii
34. thousands of years
35. bark
36. overseas museums
37. school walls
38. its significance to the group.
39. ancestors and territory.
40. Aboriginal culture.
Explanations
- 1. D
- The question's 'plans to expand production' paraphrases the passage's plan to 'build five or six factories in cities where there are large quantities of bottles' - building more factories is the concrete form the expansion plan takes.Common trap: None significant.
- 2. E
- The question's 'potential danger in the raw material' paraphrases 'possible contamination if some glass came from sources other than beverage bottles' - contamination of the glass (raw material) is the danger identified.Common trap: None significant.
- 3. G
- The question's 'use in the export market' paraphrases 'the fruit has to be washed before being despatched to European markets' - washing fruit destined for export is the specific example given.Common trap: None significant.
- 4. B
- The question's 'a comparison of the value' paraphrases the direct price contrast between green glass at '$25 a tonne' and clear glass 'worth double that amount' - two glass values set side by side.Common trap: None significant.
- 5. D
- The question's 'list of potential applications... in the domestic market' paraphrases the enumerated UK uses - 'filtering drinking water, sewage, industrial water, swimming pools and fish farming' - all domestic (UK) applications.Common trap: None significant.
- 6. F
- The question's 'conclusions drawn from laboratory checks' paraphrases Dr Fitzpatrick's testing of 'a number of batches' and her resulting judgement that 'it appears to do the job' with 'no reason to believe there would be a problem'.Common trap: None significant.
- 7. A
- The question's 'identification of current funding' paraphrases 'backed by $1.6m from the European Union and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra)' - naming the specific funding sources.Common trap: None significant.
- 8. C
- The question's 'chosen brand name' paraphrases 'Active Filtration Media, or AFM' as a 'fancy name' given to disguise the fact that it is recycled glass - the explanation of why that name was chosen.Common trap: None significant.
- 9. G
- The question's 'plans for exporting AFM' paraphrases 'a network of agents round the world to sell AFM' together with its overseas use in Central America - the international sales strategy for AFM.Common trap: None significant.
- 10. E
- The question's 'what has to happen before... accepted for general use' paraphrases the inspectorate needing 'to perform tests and approve it for widespread use by water companies' - the approval process as a precondition.Common trap: None significant.
- 11. natural resource
- The blank's 'diminishing _____' paraphrases 'an increasingly scarce natural resource, sand' - 'increasingly scarce' becomes 'diminishing'.Common trap: None significant.
- 12. recycling industry
- The blank's 'a major problem for the _____' paraphrases 'also to solve a crisis in the recycling industry' - 'crisis' becomes 'major problem'.Common trap: None significant.
- 13. drinkable liquids
- The blank directly echoes 'he needs bottles that have already contained drinkable liquids' - 'used for _____' paraphrases 'have already contained'.Common trap: None significant.
- 14. real sand
- The blank's 'more effective than _____ as a water filter' paraphrases 'AFM does the job better than sand' and 'fewer impurities than real sand and it performed better in trials' - AFM outperforming ordinary sand.Common trap: None significant.
- 15. Not Given
- The question's 'more species survive on the farms studied... than in the natural El Salvador forests' has no matching claim - Rice's 'rivals' comment is a general statement about shade-grown plantations, not a specific comparison of the El Salvador research farms against El Salvador's own natural forest.Common trap: The general comparison of shade-grown plantations to natural forests elsewhere in the passage can be mistaken for a direct statement about the specific El Salvador farms studied, but no such direct comparison is made.
- 16. False
- The question's 'nearly three-quarters... found in shade-coffee plantations' misattributes the 70% figure - the passage states it is 'these habitats' (the biodiversity-hotspot rainforest regions coffee is grown in) that support 70% of species, not the coffee plantations themselves.Common trap: 'Coffee... is usually grown in tropical rainforest regions that are biodiversity hotspots' sits right next to the 70% figure, inviting the false inference that the plantations themselves hold that 70%, when it is the surrounding habitat.
- 17. Not Given
- The question's 'farmers who have tried both methods prefer shade-grown' is never addressed - the passage discusses people's general reluctance to see shade-coffee farms go, but not a comparison made by farmers who have used both full-sun and shade-grown methods.Common trap: General regret at losing shade-coffee farms can be mistaken for a preference stated by farmers who tried both methods, but no such direct comparison by farmers is given.
- 18. True
- The question's 'important for migrating birds in both Africa and the Americas' paraphrases the two examples given - Ghana's shade cocoa as 'vital habitat for wintering European migrant birds' and Central/South America's coffee forests as 'a refuge for wintering North American migrants'.Common trap: None significant.
- 19. True
- The question's 'can increase the costs of farming' paraphrases full-sun cultivation requiring 'huge amounts of pesticides and fertilisers' - needing more inputs implies higher costs.Common trap: None significant.
- 20. D
- The statement's 'farmers using the natural forest for their plantations' paraphrases Rappole's warning of 'an incentive to convert existing areas of primary forest... into shade-coffee plantations' - converting virgin forest into new plantations.Common trap: None significant.
- 21. E
- The statement's 'match the right criteria' paraphrases Philpott's condition 'as long as the process is rigorous and offers financial gains to the producers' - meeting those criteria is what makes shade growing 'benefit the environment'.Common trap: None significant.
- 22. C
- The statement's 'as many species... as in natural habitats there' paraphrases Rice's claim that bird diversity 'rivals that found in natural forests in the same region' - 'rivals' becomes 'as many... as'.Common trap: None significant.
- 23. A
- The statement's 'earn very little' paraphrases Munro's observation that 'few of these coffee farms make much money' - a direct restatement of low earnings.Common trap: None significant.
- 24. C
- The statement's 'can be used on either coffee or cocoa' paraphrases both methods being described as applying to 'coffee (and cocoa)' - the shade-grown description and the full-sun description both explicitly cover both crops, hence 'both' methods.Common trap: None significant.
- 25. B
- The statement's 'expected to produce bigger crops' paraphrases 'a drive to increase yields' as the motive behind switching to full-sun production - 'increase yields' becomes 'bigger crops'.Common trap: None significant.
- 26. A
- The statement's 'documentation... to encourage sales' paraphrases the 'certification' system that 'can indicate to consumers' that beans are shade-grown, used as a marketing/sales tool for shade-grown coffee.Common trap: None significant.
- 27. B
- The statement's 'can reduce wildlife diversity' directly echoes 'this system... reduces the diversity of flora and fauna', referring to the full-sun system just introduced.Common trap: None significant.
- 28. vi
- Paragraph A's heading 'The increasing acclaim for Aboriginal art' paraphrases the paragraph's description of Aboriginal art being 'much in demand throughout the world' and exhibited in multiple international museums - growing international demand and recognition is 'increasing acclaim'.Common trap: None significant.
- 29. v
- Paragraph B's heading 'Mythology and history combined' paraphrases the paragraph linking the founding myth 'the Dreaming' (mythology) with the Aborigines' historical 'long quest to regain the land which was stolen from them' (history).Common trap: None significant.
- 30. viii
- Paragraph C's heading 'Oppression of a minority people' paraphrases the paragraph's account of the Aborigines being 'maltreated', 'driven back to the most barren lands', and forced into 'assimilation' and settled communities - all forms of oppression of a numerically small ('fewer than 400,000') population.Common trap: None significant.
- 31. i
- Paragraph D's heading 'Amazing results from a project' paraphrases Bardon's school-wall painting initiative and its outcome - 'he was astounded by the result' directly matches 'amazing results', and the initiative itself is 'a project'.Common trap: None significant.
- 32. iv
- Paragraph E's heading 'Early painting techniques and marketing systems' paraphrases the paragraph's description of early techniques (bark, acrylic, batik) and the churches' role helping 'to sell them to the public' - techniques plus a marketing system (churches selling the works).Common trap: None significant.
- 33. vii
- Paragraph F's heading 'Belief in continuity' paraphrases the claim that the Dreaming 'has never ceased to exist' and 'is both past, present and future' - an unbroken, continuous existence across time.Common trap: None significant.
- 34. thousands of years
- The step directly echoes 'for thousands of years Aborigines had been "painting" on the ground using sands of different colours, and on rock faces' - the time span 'thousands of years' fills the blank.Common trap: None significant.
- 35. bark
- The step directly echoes 'encouraged to reproduce on tree bark the motifs found on rock faces... Artists turned out a steady stream of works, supported by the churches' - churches supporting artists using tree bark.Common trap: None significant.
- 36. overseas museums
- The step directly echoes 'between 1950 and 1960 Aboriginal paintings began to reach overseas museums' - 'mid-twentieth century' matches the 1950-1960 date range.Common trap: None significant.
- 37. school walls
- The step directly echoes the 1971 event where Bardon 'suggested to a group of Aborigines that they should decorate the school walls with ritual motifs' - 'painted traditional patterns' paraphrases 'decorate... with ritual motifs'.Common trap: None significant.
- 38. its significance to the group.
- The option's 'significance to the group' paraphrases the paragraph's point that a work is 'created within and on behalf of a community who must approve it' and belongs to that community - the community (group) is central to the work's meaning.Common trap: None significant.
- 39. ancestors and territory.
- The option's 'ancestors and territory' directly echoes 'anchored to a territory marked out by its ancestors' - the relationship between a community's ancestors and its territory underpins each painting.Common trap: None significant.
- 40. Aboriginal culture.
- The option's 'Aboriginal culture' paraphrases 'a dialogue that has proved all too rare in the history of contacts between the two cultures' - the dialogue invited is between Western and Aboriginal culture, i.e. an engagement with Aboriginal culture.Common trap: None significant.
Comments
Loading comments…