Collins IELTS 3 Academic Reading Test 3
3 passages · 40 questions · 60 minutes
The Change Curve
Change is inevitable in any sphere of life. Although the results of change can bring great benefits, the process of change can be intensely traumatic, involve loss of choice, power and status, and when change happens in the workplace, it can even lead to loss of jobs. Many businesses and organisations use a model called the Change Curve to understand and manage how people react to change and the stages they go through before they accept it.
The concept of the Change Curve is based on work by psychiatrist Elisabeth Kubler-Ross. Her book On Death & Dying, published in 1969, dealt with the trauma and shock that people who are facing the end of life experience and how their families are also affected. Kubler-Ross proposed several stages of grief as a way of helping patients face death and their relatives deal with its effects. Kubler-Ross's ideas were groundbreaking but have since become one of the bases of grief support and counselling. Moreover, because the ideas give a framework for dealing with personal trauma and change and for helping people adjust emotionally to significant life events, the model has been adopted by organisational theory and business management.
It is worth noting that Kubler-Ross's original work described 10-13 stages of grief rather than the simpler four-stage version used by organisations, and that she did not intend them to be regarded as individual stages to be passed through in a fixed order but rather as phases of dealing with grief, which people may experience more than once at different times.
When change is introduced, in stage 1, people's first reactions may be shock or denial as their normality is threatened. Their refusal to accept the facts is a natural defensive reaction and it is important to understand this in order to help them move beyond this stage. Even when people know about a change in advance and understand the need for it, they still need to be informed of what is happening to them and their workplace. At this stage, it is important to communicate with people and to give them the sense that they are being included in the process.
If stage 1 is handled well, stage 2, a critical stage, will be smoother than if stage 1 is badly handled. In stage 2, people start to react to the change and this may generate feelings of anger, resentment or fear. They may feel angry with themselves, their workmates and even their friends. For an organisation, this is the point at which a team can fall apart and the working environment can become chaotic. Good management is crucial now and it must consider the impact the change is having on people and their emotions and address any objections they may have. Furthermore, change may affect people differently. For example, some may find that their skills are no longer useful and that their position is being threatened or undermined. Reactions to change are highly personal so it is important to listen to people and monitor the situation and, if necessary, show that you are listening by taking action in response.
Stage 3 is when the organisation begins to assimilate the changes and come out of the crisis. At this point, the changes have become real to people and they have begun to accept them. They will begin to learn in practical terms what the changes mean for them and will do this more easily if they are helped and supported to do so. Therefore, training will be important, and time for this will need to be scheduled. The organisation's productivity may slip as people begin to work with the changes instead of against them. People will stop focusing on the past and start to learn what is good about the changes and what they need to do to adapt. When they have the right skills and training to cope, the organisation can move forward again.
The final stage, stage 4, is when people embrace the new reality and begin to see the benefits. They then start seeing opportunities and build new plans and hopes. Some may actually acknowledge that the change has been for the best, while others may accept the new status quo because they have no other option. During this stage, the organisation will become more productive. At this point, it is a good idea to acknowledge the difficulties and turmoil people have been through and celebrate the success of the change.
Questions 1–8
Look at the following descriptions and the stages below. Match each description with the stage in which it occurs. NB You may use any letter more than once.
Stages
A stage 1
B stage 2
C stage 3
D stage 4
1. Common feelings are hate, bitterness and alarm about the changes.
2. Programmes to help and train people are important.
3. People reject the reality of what is happening.
4. People start to acknowledge and work with the new situation.
5. Relationships between colleagues become problematic and the working environment no longer functions properly.
6. It is important to explain forthcoming changes so that people feel involved.
7. It is important to acknowledge the positive aspects of the change and show appreciation for the way people have dealt with difficulties.
8. People start planning for their future in the new circumstances.
Questions 9–12
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1?
TRUEif the statement agrees with the information
FALSEif the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVENif there is no information on this
9. The Change Curve is a model of human behaviour that helps us understand why organisations change.
10. The ideas for the Change Curve were based on ideas used in counselling people who were dying.
11. Kubler-Ross's ideas give us a way of understanding how people adapt to significant national events.
12. A more complex version of Kubler-Ross's stages is used by organisations to understand change.
Questions 13–14
Choose TWO letters, A-E. Which TWO pieces of information are mentioned by the writer of the text in paragraphs 5-7?
13. Information selection (lower letter)
A During stage 3, the productivity of a company increases as people get used to changes.
B It is not worth spending money on training staff because they are not focused on their jobs.
C Some people only accept changes because there is no other choice.
D Changes are harder to process when people receive no support.
E Managers can prevent people from feeling any stress by communicating with staff.
14. Information selection (higher letter)
A During stage 3, the productivity of a company increases as people get used to changes.
B It is not worth spending money on training staff because they are not focused on their jobs.
C Some people only accept changes because there is no other choice.
D Changes are harder to process when people receive no support.
E Managers can prevent people from feeling any stress by communicating with staff.
Space Junk
Since the Soviet Union successfully launched the first man-made satellite, Sputnik 1, in 1957, about 5,000 more satellites have been put into orbit around the Earth. About 2,000 of these are active and although the rest are now dead, they remain in orbit, together with parts from all the rockets that carried them there. These remnants are often referred to as space junk, space trash or orbital debris. The debris ranges in size from 1-10 centimetres and there are estimated to be around half a million pieces with an additional 23,000 fragments bigger than 10 centimetres. These larger pieces can be observed and tracked from the ground. The waste is found in all zones of the Earth's orbit: low Earth orbit, which is within 2,000 kilometres of the Earth's surface; medium orbit, which is between 2,000 and 36,000 kilometres from the Earth's surface; and high orbit, which is beyond that. Most satellites are in low Earth orbit, as is the International Space Station (ISS). The problem is that most of the space debris is found there too and this is becoming a huge problem.
Some of the debris in low Earth orbit is eventually captured by the Earth's gravity and burns up when it enters the Earth's atmosphere or reaches its surface. However, most of the space junk stays in low Earth orbit and this can have several unwanted consequences. In 2009, almost 500 miles above Siberia, there was a collision between the obsolete Russian satellite Cosmos 2251 and the working US communication satellite Iridium 33. The satellites collided with each other at a speed of 11.7 kilometres per second and produced more than 2,000 pieces of debris. This was the first time two satellites were actually observed hitting each other in space, and the fragments from that collision could be seen spreading out over a very wide area over the following months.
Even though the area within low Earth orbit is vast, the speed at which pieces of junk travel means that they are deadly at the infrequent times they encounter another object. In 2006 a small piece of space junk hit the ISS and damaged one of its windows. Later, in 2014, the ISS had to make an emergency manoeuvre to avoid a piece of junk from the Russian Cosmos 2251 satellite smashing into it. The potential disaster was only averted because a supply vehicle that was docked with the space station fired its thrusters and raised the ISS by one kilometre out of the path of the space junk. This example illustrates the first problem with the debris: satellites need to carry out important work but are in constant danger of being damaged or destroyed. The ISS was designed to withstand impacts from debris up to one centimetre in size but in order to prevent it being hit by larger objects, scientists have to watch for space junk and try to move the station out of harm's way if necessary; the lives of the people on board could be at risk so it is extremely important to monitor the paths of the pieces of debris. However, it is very difficult to accurately plot the course of a debris fragment and so the ISS is only moved when there is probability of a strike. The junk from Cosmos 2251 was spotted only six hours before it passed within three kilometres of the ISS's position. As debris is broken into smaller and smaller pieces, tracking it becomes increasingly difficult.
The second problem is what happens when we launch satellites and rockets in the future. Some scientists describe space junk as an umbrella or ring around the Earth, which any future launch will need to punch through to go into space. No one really knows how bad the problem has to get before it prevents us putting objects into space or makes it very expensive to do so. The astrophysicist Donald Kessler, who used to work for NASA, calculated that if there is enough junk in orbit, collisions between pieces would create high-velocity smaller pieces of debris that would then hit even more objects, resulting in a chain reaction, producing more and more destructive pieces of debris. The problem is made worse when satellites remain in space after their working lives or when they are destroyed deliberately. An anti-satellite test in 2007 destroyed an obsolete weather satellite, creating 3,000 pieces of space debris, and a missile strike in 2019 scattered thousands more pieces into orbit. The gradual accumulation of space junk caused by debris colliding and creating more junk is called the Kessler syndrome and it will build up over the next 100 years. Eventually, the time between collisions will become shorter and shorter, and it is predicted that a cloud of deadly space junk will circle the planet.
Kessler believes that we need legislation that requires countries to build satellites that re-enter the atmosphere after their mission has ended and impose penalties on countries that do not do this. The problem is that the damage is already done and even if everyone keeps to the rules, collisions are still happening and the amount of debris is growing. This points to a second aspect of the potential solution: clean up the biggest pieces. The larger debris could be tracked and removed; Kessler believes that if we could take just five objects per year out of orbit, the problem would stabilise. Although this sounds simple, satellites travel at great speeds and some are very large. Ideas for dealing with inactive satellites include removing them using harpoons or nets based on the ISS. A satellite service station that would repair satellites and extend their working lives has also been proposed. Whichever solution is brought forward, however, it will need international cooperation and this could be more difficult to achieve than catching the wayward satellites.
Questions 15–19
Complete each sentence with the correct ending, A-H, below.
15. A large number of the satellites that orbit the Earth
A can be found mostly in the same orbit area as the International Space Station.
B produce even more debris that travels large distances.
C are above Siberia.
D are no longer active.
E can be seen and followed from Earth.
F circle the planet in the medium Earth orbit.
G burn up and are destroyed as they fall back to ground.
H are among the 5,000 satellites that are circling the Earth.
16. Pieces of space junk that are larger than 10 centimetres
A can be found mostly in the same orbit area as the International Space Station.
B produce even more debris that travels large distances.
C are above Siberia.
D are no longer active.
E can be seen and followed from Earth.
F circle the planet in the medium Earth orbit.
G burn up and are destroyed as they fall back to ground.
H are among the 5,000 satellites that are circling the Earth.
17. Pieces of debris that have resulted from collisions
A can be found mostly in the same orbit area as the International Space Station.
B produce even more debris that travels large distances.
C are above Siberia.
D are no longer active.
E can be seen and followed from Earth.
F circle the planet in the medium Earth orbit.
G burn up and are destroyed as they fall back to ground.
H are among the 5,000 satellites that are circling the Earth.
18. Some objects that are in low Earth orbit
A can be found mostly in the same orbit area as the International Space Station.
B produce even more debris that travels large distances.
C are above Siberia.
D are no longer active.
E can be seen and followed from Earth.
F circle the planet in the medium Earth orbit.
G burn up and are destroyed as they fall back to ground.
H are among the 5,000 satellites that are circling the Earth.
19. Collisions that happen at high speed
A can be found mostly in the same orbit area as the International Space Station.
B produce even more debris that travels large distances.
C are above Siberia.
D are no longer active.
E can be seen and followed from Earth.
F circle the planet in the medium Earth orbit.
G burn up and are destroyed as they fall back to ground.
H are among the 5,000 satellites that are circling the Earth.
Questions 20–23
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
20. The International Space Station managed to avoid a piece of space junk because
A one of its windows was damaged.
B a supply vehicle moved it out of its path.
C scientists did not want to smash a Russian satellite.
D space junk travels at incredible speeds.
21. Because both satellites and space debris are in low Earth orbit,
A satellites are built to withstand impact.
B there is a high probability of collisions happening.
C scientists try to accurately predict the orbit of the debris.
D the International Space Station is frequently moved to avoid them.
22. The amount of junk in space will NOT lead to
A more expensive space flights.
B a huge ball of space junk around the Earth.
C easier tracking of orbiting fragments.
D a chain reaction of pieces of debris hitting each other and creating more junk.
23. The problem of space junk is being made worse due to
A the intentional destruction of old satellites.
B the high concentration of pieces of debris.
C inactive satellites not returning to Earth.
D a lack of understanding of the extent of the problem.
Questions 24–29
Complete the summary below. Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the passage for each answer.
24. Kessler believes that countries should be required to make satellites …………………………
25. the Earth's atmosphere at the end of their life and make them pay …………………………
26. if they do not do this. At the same time, we need to …………………………
27. the situation by removing larger objects from low Earth orbit. This is difficult because of the …………………………
28. of such objects, but ideas include catching them with …………………………
29. or building a ………………………… to extend their active lives.
The Tree of Life
[A] The baobab tree has a very distinctive appearance, with a large, round trunk and branches that look like roots reaching into the air. The latter gained it the name of the 'upside-down tree' but it is also known by other names. The origin of the word 'baobab' is not clear; it may come from the Arabic bu hibab, referring to a fruit with many seeds, or from the medieval Latin bahobab, apparently from a central African language. It grows in arid regions of the southern hemisphere and has evolved unique ways of surviving in water-scarce environments. The tree is common throughout sub-Saharan Africa, Madagascar and north-western Australia. It is impressive, not just because of its appearance and ability to survive in harsh climates, but also because of its size. In Zimbabwe, one baobab grew so big that 40 adults could fit inside it. A baobab can grow 25 metres high and as it gets older, the middle of the trunk becomes hollowed out. The hollow trunk is used as shelter by animals, and humans too have used it for a variety of purposes; one tree was even used as a prison cell. Indeed, the baobab is one of the biggest flowering plants in the world and produces fruits that are prized by people and animals alike for food.
[B] Baobabs are long lived but unlike other trees, it is very difficult, if not impossible, to discover their age by counting annual growth rings in the trunk because their growth rings are very faint. Instead, researchers use radiocarbon dating to analyse samples from trees. The oldest specimen found so far was 2,500 years old. The trees have a staged growth pattern that was observed by the naturalist Von Breitenbach, who described four phases. The first is the young or sapling phase, which lasts until the tree is 15 years old. During this phase, it reaches a height of about six metres. The second phase is the cone phase, which lasts until the tree is 60-70 years old. This is the period when growth is the fastest and the tree reaches about 15 metres in height. In the third phase, the bottle phase, the trunk broadens out to produce the tree's iconic shape, and at 200-300 years old, it gains a height of about 20 metres. During the old age phase, the trunk expands further and becomes hollow. The tree eventually dies aged 500-800 years, although some individuals survive much longer.
[C] A master of water management, the baobab can hold up to 120,000 litres of water in its trunk, which is incredibly useful for animals and humans in times of drought. Both are able to pierce the tree to access the water, and this is probably why many trees can be found along trade routes in Africa. The trunk is not a single structure but is composed of many stems fused together. This creates gaps in the trunk to capture precious water, which can be absorbed later by the tree - unless people or animals find it first.
[D] The tree first flowers after 20 years of age and the flowering period can be up to 6 weeks. The flowers appear in early summer (October to December in the southern hemisphere) and they are extraordinary. White in colour, heavy and large, they open during the evening simultaneously and survive for just 24 hours. When they open, they have a sweet smell but the scent becomes unpleasant later on as they turn brown and then fall. The flowers are pollinated mainly by fruit bats, which are attracted by the strong smell, and to a lesser extent by bushbabies as well as various insects. After flowering, the baobab produces large fruit pods about 20 centimetres long, which hang down from the tree. The pods take six months to ripen before falling to the ground, from where they can be harvested. Inside are small black seeds that are covered with a white powdery substance that tastes lemony and delicious and is a valuable food source. The fruit has many uses: it can be made into a drink that is high in vitamins C and B2, and it has been used to treat fevers; the seeds are pressed into oil or roasted as snacks; and the shell can be made into a musical percussion instrument.
[E] Like many giant trees, an old baobab creates its own ecosystem. It supports the life of thousands of creatures, from the largest mammals to insects and other small animals that shelter in its crevices. Birds nest in its branches; baboons eat its fruit; bushbabies and fruit bats drink the nectar. Little wonder the baobab is sometimes called the 'tree of life'. However, like all living things, the baobab does eventually die and when this happens, it collapses quickly and disintegrates into fibres. Perhaps this has given rise to another of its names, the 'magic tree'; its disintegration is so fast that the tree simply seems to disappear.
Questions 30–32
Complete the sentences below. Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.
30. The baobab is called the 'upside-down tree' because its ………………………… stick into the air like tree roots.
31. It is also called the 'tree of life' because many creatures depend on it for water, food, ………………………… and as a place to live.
32. Because the baobab ………………………… so quickly at the end of its life, people also call it the 'magic tree'.
Questions 33–35
Complete the table below. Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage for each answer.
| Age (years) | Phase | Height | Feature |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10-15 | sapling | 3-6 metres | — |
| 60-70 | (33) ………………………… | 5-15 metres | the tree's (34) ………………………… |
| 70-300 | bottle | 10-20 metres | the trunk (35) ………………………… takes on the familiar baobab shape |
| 300-800 | old age | — | the tree trunk becomes hollow and expands |
Questions 36–40
Reading Passage 3 has five paragraphs labelled A-E. Which paragraph contains the following information?
36. how the baobab reproduces
37. the end of the baobab's life
38. how the baobab survives in dry conditions
39. the climate and regions in which the tree grows
40. how scientists date the trees
Answers
1. B
2. C
3. A
4. C
5. B
6. A
7. D
8. D
9. False
10. True
11. Not Given
12. False
13. Some people only accept changes because there is no other choice.
14. Changes are harder to process when people receive no support.
15. are no longer active.
16. can be seen and followed from Earth.
17. can be found mostly in the same orbit area as the International Space Station.
18. burn up and are destroyed as they fall back to ground.
19. produce even more debris that travels large distances.
20. a supply vehicle moved it out of its path.
21. scientists try to accurately predict the orbit of the debris.
22. easier tracking of orbiting fragments.
23. the intentional destruction of old satellites.
24. re-enter
25. penalties
26. stabilise
27. size
28. harpoons or nets
29. satellite service station
30. branches
31. shelter
32. disintegrates
33. cone
34. growth
35. broadens out
36. D
37. E
38. C
39. A
40. B
Explanations
- 1. B
- Stage 2 involves reactions like anger, resentment, and fear. Paraphrase: 'Negative emotions such as hostility and worry arise.' Distractor analysis: stage 1 is denial/shock; stage 3 is acceptance and learning; stage 4 is embracing the change.Common trap: None significant — the answer is directly stated.
- 2. C
- In stage 3, people need help and support to learn what the changes mean, so training is important. Paraphrase: 'Training and support are crucial during the assimilation phase.' Distractor analysis: stage 2 is about managing emotions; stage 4 is about celebrating success, not training.Common trap: None significant — the answer is directly stated.
- 3. A
- Stage 1 is characterised by shock or denial, where people refuse to accept the facts. Paraphrase: 'They refuse to believe the change is real.' Distractor analysis: stage 2 is about anger; stage 3 is about acceptance.Common trap: None significant — the answer is directly stated.
- 4. C
- In stage 3, changes become real to people and they begin to accept and work with them. Paraphrase: 'They begin to cooperate with the new reality.' Distractor analysis: stage 4 is when they embrace and see benefits — a later, more positive stage than the initial acceptance and cooperation described here.Common trap: Adjacent-stage trap — stage 4 (embracing benefits) describes a later development of the same general acceptance theme.
- 5. B
- In stage 2, teams can fall apart and the working environment becomes chaotic. Paraphrase: 'Collegial relationships suffer and workplace order breaks down.' Distractor analysis: stage 1 is denial; stage 3 is about assimilation and moving forward, not chaos.Common trap: None significant — the answer is directly stated.
- 6. A
- In stage 1, even when people know about change, they need to be informed so they feel included. Paraphrase: 'Communication and inclusion are key in the initial phase.' Distractor analysis: stage 2 is about managing emotions once change has started; stage 3 is about training.Common trap: None significant — the answer is directly stated.
- 7. D
- In the final stage, it is a good idea to acknowledge the difficulties people have been through and celebrate success. Paraphrase: 'Recognise the challenges and celebrate the achievements.' Distractor analysis: stage 3 is about learning and training; stage 2 is about managing anger, not celebrating.Common trap: None significant — the answer is directly stated.
- 8. D
- In stage 4, people embrace the new reality, see opportunities, and build new plans. Paraphrase: 'They look forward and make future plans.' Distractor analysis: stage 3 is about accepting and learning to work with change, not yet forward planning.Common trap: None significant — the answer is directly stated.
- 9. False
- The Change Curve helps understand how people react to change and the stages they go through before accepting it, not why organisations change. Paraphrase: 'The model explains the reaction to change, not the reasons behind organisational change.' Distractor analysis: True would misrepresent the model's stated purpose.Common trap: Purpose-substitution trap — the statement swaps the model's actual purpose (reactions to change) for a different one (reasons for change).
- 10. True
- The Change Curve is based on Kubler-Ross's work with people facing the end of life and their families. Paraphrase: 'Her grief stages for dying patients inspired the model.' Distractor analysis: False would contradict the 'based on' statement.Common trap: None significant — the answer is directly stated.
- 11. Not Given
- The passage says the ideas help adjust to 'significant life events', but it never mentions 'national events'. Paraphrase: 'The model addresses personal and organisational change, not specifically national events.' Distractor analysis: True would require mention of national events; False would require the passage to say it does not apply — neither happens.Common trap: Not Given trap — a plausible-sounding scope ('national events') is never actually mentioned.
- 12. False
- Kubler-Ross's original work described 10-13 stages, but organisations use a simpler four-stage version. Paraphrase: 'Organisations use a simplified version, not a more complex one.' Distractor analysis: True would contradict the 'simpler' statement directly.Common trap: Reversed-truth trap — the statement claims the opposite of what the passage explicitly says (simpler, not more complex).
- 13. Some people only accept changes because there is no other choice.
- In paragraph 7 (stage 4), the writer states some people accept change because they have no other option. In paragraph 6 (stage 3), the writer states people learn more easily if they are helped and supported. Paraphrase: 'Some accept reluctantly, without alternatives; support aids adjustment.'Common trap: Reversed-timing trap — option A misplaces when productivity actually increases (stage 4, not stage 3).
- 14. Changes are harder to process when people receive no support.
- See the explanation for the paired question above — this option is the higher-indexed correct answer of the pair.Common trap: Reversed-timing trap — option A misplaces when productivity actually increases (stage 4, not stage 3).
- 15. are no longer active.
- Out of about 5,000 satellites launched, roughly 2,000 are active, meaning the remaining 3,000 are dead. Paraphrase: 'Most satellites that were launched are now defunct.' Distractor analysis: option H says they are among the 5,000 satellites, which is true but does not answer the specific point about their status.Common trap: Trivial-truth trap — option H is technically true but too generic to answer what the sentence specifically asks about.
- 16. can be seen and followed from Earth.
- Fragments bigger than 10 cm can be observed and tracked from the ground. Paraphrase: 'Large debris can be monitored by ground stations.' Distractor analysis: option A is true of debris in general (most is in low Earth orbit like the ISS), but it is not the specific point being made about size.Common trap: General-vs-specific trap — option A is a true general fact about debris location, not the specific consequence of being larger than 10 cm.
- 17. can be found mostly in the same orbit area as the International Space Station.
- Most satellites and space debris are in low Earth orbit, which is where the ISS is located. Paraphrase: 'The ISS shares its orbital zone with most debris, including collision fragments.' Distractor analysis: option C describes only the specific location of one particular 2009 collision, not a general statement about collision debris.Common trap: One-instance-vs-general-rule trap — option C names the location of a single specific collision rather than the general pattern.
- 18. burn up and are destroyed as they fall back to ground.
- Some debris in low Earth orbit is captured by gravity and burns up upon re-entry. Paraphrase: 'Some junk incinerates as it falls back to Earth.' Distractor analysis: option D describes satellites specifically, not all objects, and does not describe what happens to them in low Earth orbit.Common trap: Category-confusion trap — option D applies specifically to satellites' operational status, not to what happens to objects physically in orbit.
- 19. produce even more debris that travels large distances.
- The 2009 collision produced over 2,000 pieces of debris that spread out over a very wide area. Paraphrase: 'High-speed impacts generate widespread fragments.' Distractor analysis: option C describes the location of one specific collision, not a general statement about the effect of high-speed collisions.Common trap: One-instance-vs-general-rule trap — option C names the location of one specific event rather than the general consequence of high-speed collisions.
- 20. a supply vehicle moved it out of its path.
- A supply vehicle docked to the ISS fired its thrusters and raised the station's orbit. Paraphrase: 'A docked craft propelled the ISS to safety.'Common trap: Event-confusion trap — option A confuses a separate, earlier 2006 incident with the 2014 avoidance manoeuvre being asked about.
- 21. scientists try to accurately predict the orbit of the debris.
- It is extremely important to monitor debris paths, though this is very difficult to do accurately. Paraphrase: 'Scientists work to track and predict debris paths.'Common trap: Frequency-exaggeration trap — option D overstates how often the ISS is actually moved.
- 22. easier tracking of orbiting fragments.
- As debris breaks into smaller and smaller pieces, tracking it becomes increasingly difficult, not easier. Paraphrase: 'Tracking gets harder, not easier, as junk accumulates.'Common trap: Reversed-truth trap — the correct answer directly contradicts what the passage actually states about tracking difficulty.
- 23. the intentional destruction of old satellites.
- Deliberate destruction of satellites, such as anti-satellite tests, creates thousands of pieces of debris. Paraphrase: 'Purposefully blowing up satellites adds significantly more junk.'Common trap: Symptom-vs-cause trap — option B describes a symptom of the problem rather than a specific cause of it worsening.
- 24. re-enter
- Legislation should require satellites to re-enter the atmosphere after their missions end. Paraphrase: 'Satellites must be designed to fall back into the atmosphere.' Distractor analysis: 'enter' alone is incomplete; the exact word used in the passage is 're-enter'.Common trap: Incomplete-word trap — the shorter word 'enter' is tempting but not the exact passage word.
- 25. penalties
- Countries that fail to comply should face penalties. Paraphrase: 'Fines or sanctions should be imposed on non-compliant countries.' Distractor analysis: 'fines' is a plausible synonym, but the exact word used in the passage is 'penalties'.Common trap: Synonym trap — a near-synonym is tempting but not the exact passage word.
- 26. stabilise
- Removing just five objects per year would stabilise the problem, according to Kessler. Paraphrase: 'Prevent the situation from worsening further.' Distractor analysis: 'solve' is not used; the exact word in the passage is 'stabilise'.Common trap: Overstatement trap — 'solve' overstates what the passage actually claims ('stabilise').
- 27. size
- Satellites travel at great speeds and some are very large, making removal difficult. Paraphrase: 'Their sheer size poses a challenge.' Distractor analysis: 'speed' is also a factor mentioned, but the blank specifically follows 'because of the _____ of such objects', matching 'very large' — i.e. size.Common trap: Multiple-candidate trap — 'speed' is also mentioned nearby and could be wrongly picked instead of 'size'.
- 28. harpoons or nets
- Ideas for removing inactive satellites include using harpoons or nets. Paraphrase: 'Capture methods proposed include harpoons and nets.' Distractor analysis: 'harpoons' alone is incomplete; the exact phrase used in the passage is 'harpoons or nets'.Common trap: Incomplete-phrase trap — naming only one of the two methods is tempting but incomplete.
- 29. satellite service station
- A satellite service station would repair satellites and extend their working lives. Paraphrase: 'A repair depot could keep satellites functioning longer.' Distractor analysis: 'service station' alone is incomplete; the exact phrase used in the passage is 'satellite service station'.Common trap: Incomplete-phrase trap — the shorter phrase 'service station' is tempting but the full three-word phrase is required.
- 30. branches
- The branches look like roots reaching upward. Paraphrase: 'The limbs resemble roots growing into the sky.' Distractor analysis: 'trunk' is not the part that looks like roots; the correct part described is 'branches'.Common trap: Part-confusion trap — 'trunk' is a prominent nearby noun but is not the part described as resembling roots.
- 31. shelter
- The baobab supports life by providing water, food, shelter, and a place to live for many creatures. Paraphrase: 'It offers protective cover for many animals.' Distractor analysis: 'nests' is related but too specific; the general term used in the passage is 'shelter'.Common trap: Specific-vs-general trap — 'nests' names one specific example, but the general term required is 'shelter'.
- 32. disintegrates
- The tree collapses and disintegrates into fibres quickly, as if by magic. Paraphrase: 'It falls apart rapidly.' Distractor analysis: 'collapses' is mentioned alongside it, but the specific word for the rapid disappearance is 'disintegrates'.Common trap: Near-synonym trap — 'collapses' appears in the same sentence but is not the exact word required for this blank.
- 33. cone
- The second phase is the cone phase, lasting until the tree is 60-70 years old. Paraphrase: 'The middle phase is named the cone phase.' Distractor analysis: 'bottle' is the third phase; 'sapling' is the first phase.Common trap: Sequence-confusion trap — the names of the adjacent phases (sapling, bottle) could be wrongly substituted here.
- 34. growth
- This is the period when growth is fastest for the baobab. Paraphrase: 'The cone phase is marked by the tree's most rapid growth.' Distractor analysis: 'height' is the numerical result, but the feature described is 'growth' itself.Common trap: Result-vs-feature trap — 'height' names a measurable outcome, not the feature ('growth') being described.
- 35. broadens out
- In the bottle phase, the trunk broadens out to produce the tree's iconic shape. Paraphrase: 'The trunk widens significantly during this phase.' Distractor analysis: 'expands' is a plausible synonym, but the exact phrase used in the passage is 'broadens out'.Common trap: Synonym trap — a near-synonym is tempting but not the exact passage phrase.
- 36. D
- Paragraph D describes flowering, pollination (by fruit bats, bushbabies, insects), and fruit production. Paraphrase: 'This section covers the tree's reproductive cycle.' Distractor analysis: no other paragraph discusses flowering or pollination.Common trap: None significant — the answer is directly supported by unique content.
- 37. E
- Paragraph E describes the tree's death, collapse, and disintegration. Paraphrase: 'This section describes how the tree dies and disappears.' Distractor analysis: no other paragraph discusses the end of the tree's life.Common trap: None significant — the answer is directly supported by unique content.
- 38. C
- Paragraph C explains water storage in the trunk and how the tree captures and absorbs water. Paraphrase: 'This paragraph details its water management strategies.' Distractor analysis: paragraph A mentions the tree grows in arid regions, but C explains the specific mechanism (how), not just the setting.Common trap: Setting-vs-mechanism trap — paragraph A gives the general habitat, while C gives the specific survival mechanism being asked about.
- 39. A
- Paragraph A states the baobab grows in arid regions of the southern hemisphere, in sub-Saharan Africa, Madagascar, and north-western Australia. Paraphrase: 'This section gives the tree's habitat and geographic distribution.' Distractor analysis: no other paragraph gives this geographic overview.Common trap: None significant — the answer is directly supported by unique content.
- 40. B
- Paragraph B explains that radiocarbon dating is used to determine age because growth rings are too faint to count. Paraphrase: 'Researchers use radiocarbon dating to find the tree's age.' Distractor analysis: no other paragraph discusses dating methods.Common trap: None significant — the answer is directly supported by unique content.
Comments
Loading comments…