Cambridge IELTS 8 General Training Reading Test 2
3 passages · 42 questions · 60 minutes
Consumer Advice on Buying Shoes / Lost Cards
[[READ: 1–8]]
CONSUMER ADVICE ON BUYING SHOES
If you have a problem with shoes you've recently bought, follow this four-step plan.
Step 1 Go back to the shop with proof of purchase. If you return faulty shoes at once, you have a right to insist on a refund. It is also likely that you will get one if you change your mind about the shoes and take them back immediately. But, if you delay or you've had some use out of the shoes, the shop may not give you all your money back. It depends on the state of the shoes and how long you've had them.
If you are offered a credit note, you don't have to accept it. If you accept it, you will usually not be able to exchange it for cash later on. So, you may be left with an unwanted credit note, if you cannot find any other shoes you want from the shop.
The shop may want to send the shoes back to head office for inspection. This is fair and could help to sort things out. But don't be put off by the shop which claims that it's the manufacturer's responsibility. This isn't true. It's the shop's legal duty to put things right.
Step 2 If you don't seem to be getting anywhere, you can get help. Free advice is available from a Citizens Advice Bureau (get the address from your telephone book), or from a local Trading Standards Department. Again, consult the telephone directory under County, Regional or Borough Council. All these departments have people who can advise you about faulty goods and what to do with them.
Step 3 Most shops are covered by the Footwear Code of Practice. If the shop you are dealing with is covered, you can ask for the shoes to be sent to the Footwear Testing Centre for an independent opinion. The shop has to agree with whatever the resulting report says. There is a charge of £21. You pay £7 and the shop pays the rest (including postage).
Step 4 As a last resort, you can take your case to court. This is not as difficult as it sounds. The small claims procedure for amounts up to £1000 (£750 in Scotland) is a cheap, easy and informal way of taking legal action.
The relevant forms are available from your nearest County Court or, in Scotland, the Sheriff Court. You can get advice and leaflets from the Citizens Advice Bureau. Alternatively, some bookshops sell advice packs which contain the relevant forms.
[[READ: 9–14]]
LOST CARDS
If you discover that your credit card, cheque book, debit card or cash card is missing, telephone the credit card company or bank as soon as possible. Follow this up with a letter. If you suspect theft, tell the police as well. In most circumstances, provided you act quickly, you will not have to pay any bills which a thief runs up on your account. Most home insurance policies will also cover you against even this limited risk.
Because plastic money is now so common, central registration schemes such as Credit Card Shield and Card Protection System exist to help customers whose cards are lost or stolen. Under the schemes you file details of all your cards – including cash cards and account cards issued by shops – with a central registry, for a small annual fee. Then, if any or all of your cards are stolen, you need to make only one phone call to the registry, which is open around the clock 365 days a year. As soon as you have called, your responsibility for any bills run up by the thief ends and the scheme's staff make sure that all the companies whose cards you had are notified.
What you stand to lose on a stolen card
CREDIT CARD You will not have to pay more than £50 of the bills a thief runs up with your card. If you report the loss before the card is used, you will not have to pay anything.
CHEQUES AND GUARANTEE CARD Unless you have been careless – by signing blank cheques, say – you will not have to pay for any forged cheques a thief uses. The bank or shop that accepts them will have to bear the loss.
DEBIT CARD (Switch or Visa Delta) The banks operate a system similar to that for credit cards, in that you are liable for bills up to £50.
If your cash card is stolen
Legally, you can be made to pay back any sums a thief withdraws using your card, but only up to the time you report the loss and up to £50, unless the bank can prove gross negligence, such as writing your personal identification number on your card.
• Never keep your card and a note of your personal number (which does not appear on the card) together. • Memorise your personal number if possible. If you must make a note of it, disguise it as something else – a telephone number, say. • The same rules and precautions apply to a credit card used as a cash card.
Questions 1–8
Do the following statements agree with the information given in the text?
TRUEif the statement agrees with the information
FALSEif the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVENif there is no information on this
1. Write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information, FALSE if the statement contradicts the information, or NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this. If you return unwanted shoes straightaway, with a receipt, the shop will probably give you a refund.
2. Write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information, FALSE if the statement contradicts the information, or NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this. You are advised to accept a credit note if you are offered one.
3. Write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information, FALSE if the statement contradicts the information, or NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this. The factory is responsible for replacing unwanted shoes.
4. Write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information, FALSE if the statement contradicts the information, or NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this. You can ask any shoe shop to send shoes to the Footwear Testing Centre.
5. Write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information, FALSE if the statement contradicts the information, or NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this. Shops prefer to give a credit note rather than change shoes.
6. Write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information, FALSE if the statement contradicts the information, or NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this. The customer contributes to the cost of having faulty shoes tested.
7. Write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information, FALSE if the statement contradicts the information, or NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this. The procedure for making a legal claim is easier in Scotland.
8. Write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information, FALSE if the statement contradicts the information, or NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this. Legal advice and forms can be bought from certain shops.
Question 9
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
9. What should you do first if you lose a credit card?
A contact your insurance company
B write a letter
C contact the police
D make a phone call
Questions 10–14
Choose the correct letter.
10. Credit Card Shield is
A an insurance company which deals with card theft.
B a system for registering people's card details.
C an emergency telephone answering service.
D an agency for finding lost or stolen cards.
11. When contacted, the Card Protection System company will
A inform the police about the loss of the card.
B get in touch with the relevant credit card companies.
C ensure that lost cards are replaced.
D give details about the loss of the card to shops.
12. You are fully covered by both banks and shops if you lose
A a cheque that is signed but not otherwise completed.
B a blank unsigned cheque.
C a Switch card.
D a credit card.
13. If you have written your personal number on a stolen card, you may have to
A join a different credit card protection scheme.
B pay up to £50 for any loss incurred.
C pay for anything the thief buys on it.
D change your account to a different bank.
14. What happens if your cash card is stolen?
A You arrange for the card to be returned.
B The bank stops you withdrawing money.
C You may have to pay up to £50 of any stolen money.
D You cannot use a cash card in future.
Recycling at Work / How to Answer Any Interview Question
[[READ: 15–21]]
RECYCLING AT WORK – HANDY HINTS TO EMPLOYERS
It is estimated that avoidable waste costs UK businesses up to 4.5% of their annual revenue. Reducing waste in the workplace is about being efficient. By becoming more efficient, businesses not only increase profits but they also save natural resources.
On the island of Jersey, for example, the amount of waste produced each year has doubled since 1980. In 2004 it topped 100,000 tonnes – and 60% is generated by local businesses. A lot of waste for a small island!
Setting up a company scheme
Waste audit Before starting a recycling scheme, perform an audit. This will make you aware of how much waste you are producing in the company.
Company policy Consider switching your office waste contractor to one that provides a recycling service. Buy recycled paper. Although this is sometimes more expensive, costs can be reduced by lowering consumption and using duplex printers.
Get everyone involved • Raise awareness internally within the company, perhaps by putting up educational posters. • Allocate a person to be the point of contact for anyone with queries.
There are also a couple of ways to increase motivation: • Hold internal competitions between different departments. For example, see which can reduce their waste the most within a specific time period. • Send out regular newsletters reporting on all waste improvements. Staff will then see the impact their actions are having.
What to recycle and how
Paper According to a recent survey, 65% of waste produced is paper waste. Waste paper will inevitably be produced in the workplace, but it is not necessary to discard it. It can serve a variety of purposes before it is recycled, such as writing notes. Envelopes too can be re-used for internal mail.
Plastic cups Rather than supplying disposable plastic cups in your workplace, get ceramic mugs that can be re-used. Not only do they make your tea taste better, but they can reduce your office waste by up to 1%!
Electrical equipment Rather than giving up on any old electrical equipment and just throwing it away, why not try upgrading it? This reduces waste, as well as avoiding the need to manufacture a new machine – a process which creates a large amount of waste. You could also consider donating your old computers to charities when it comes to replacing them.
[[READ: 22–27]]
HOW TO ANSWER ANY INTERVIEW QUESTION
To start, take a tip from consultants who coach executives on how to handle media interviews. They say you can deliver the message you want to an employer, regardless of the question you're asked.
'Unlike some politicians, who take no notice of press questions and immediately introduce a different topic in response, job candidates must answer employers' queries,' says John Barford of the interview training firm Genesis. 'However, you can quickly make the transition from your answer to the important points you want to convey about your qualifications,' he says.
He advises candidates at job interviews to apply the formula Q = A + 1: Q is the question; A is the answer; + is the bridge to the message you want to deliver; and 1 is the point you want to make.
Diligent preparation is also necessary to effectively answer any interview question, say senior executives. They give a number of useful tips:
• Learn as much as you can beforehand. Ask company employees questions prior to job interviews to gain as much insight as you can. If the company is publicly owned, find out how viable it is by reading shareholder reports. You can then tailor what you say to the company's issues. • Be prepared for questions that require you to show how you handled difficult challenges. These questions require stories in response, but as it's unlikely that you'll have one that fits every situation, try to recall some from your past experience that show how you coped with a range of issues. • Count on being asked about a past mistake or blemish on your career record, and don't try to dodge the issue. Ms Murphy, president of the Murphy Group, a media interview training firm, says that it's important to steer clear of lies at all costs. Just answer the question and move on. • When discussing a mistake, focus on the positive outcomes. 'You learn as much by dropping the ball as you do by catching it,' says senior executive Mr Friedmann. When he was being interviewed for his current job, he mentioned he had been involved in many successful turnarounds and one that failed. 'And I said how I'd benefited in many ways from going through that experience,' he says.
Questions 15–21
Answer the questions below. Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the text for each answer.
15. What does the writer think should be carried out in a company before it starts recycling?
16. What machines can help to cut the stationery budget?
17. What can be displayed in the workplace to publicise the recycling scheme?
18. What can be distributed to motivate staff to recycle more?
19. What can unwanted paper be used for in the office?
20. What can be bought to cut down on the waste produced by staff refreshments?
21. Where can unwanted PCs be sent?
Questions 22–27
Complete the sentences below. Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the text for each answer.
22. The writer warns candidates not to imitate the way that ………………………… ignore questions in interviews.
23. Interviewees are recommended to follow a certain ………………………… to allow them to communicate their main points.
24. Senior executives advise candidates to request information from ………………………… before an interview.
25. A candidate can also learn about a business by studying its ………………………….
26. The head of an interview training firm advises people to avoid telling ………………………….
27. In his job interview, one executive explained how he had ………………………… considerably from a previous failure.
Talking Point
TALKING POINT
Learning a second language fuels children's intelligence and makes their job prospects brighter. But the fact is, in New Zealand, as in many other English-speaking countries, speakers of two or more languages are in the minority. Eighty-four per cent of New Zealanders are monolingual (speakers of only one language). This leaves a small number who claim to speak two or more languages – a small percentage of whom were born in New Zealand.
No matter how proud people are of their cultural roots, to speak anything other than English is a marker of difference here. That's why eight-year-old Tiffany Dvorak no longer wishes to speak her mother-tongue, German, and eight-year-old Ani Powell is embarrassed when people comment on the fact that she is able to speak Maori*. As Joanne Powell, Ani's mother, points out: 'In Europe, it's not unusual for kids to be bilingual. But, if you speak another language to your children in New Zealand, there are some people who think that you are not helping them to become a member of society.'
But in fact, the general agreement among experts is that learning a second language is good for children. Experts believe that bilinguals – people who speak two languages – have a clear learning advantage over their monolingual schoolmates. This depends on how much of each language they can speak, not on which language is used, so it doesn't matter whether they are learning Maori or German or Chinese or any other language.
Cathie Elder, a professor of Language Teaching and Learning at Auckland University, says: 'A lot of studies have shown that children who speak more than one language sometimes learn one language more slowly, but in the end they do as well as their monolingual schoolmates, and often better, in other subjects. The view is that there is an improvement in general intelligence from the effort of learning another language.'
Dr Brigitte Halford, a professor of linguistics at Freiburg University in Germany, agrees. 'Bilinguals tend to use language better as a whole,' she says. 'They also display greater creativity and problem-solving ability, and they learn further languages more easily.'
So with all of the benefits, why do we not show more enthusiasm for learning other languages? Parents and teachers involved in bilingual education say pressure from friends at school, general attitudes to other languages in English-speaking countries, and problems in the school system are to blame.
In New Zealand, immigrants face the possibility of culture being lost along with the language their children no longer wish to speak. Tiffany's mother, Susanne Dvorak, has experienced this. When she and husband Dieter left Germany six years ago to start up a new life in New Zealand, they thought it would be the perfect opportunity to raise their two-year-old as a bilingual. After all, bilingual Turkish families in Germany were normal and Susanne had read all the books she could find on the subject.
The idea was to have home as a German language environment and for Tiffany to learn English at nursery school. But when Tiffany went to nursery school she stopped talking completely. She was quiet for about two or three months. Then, when she took up talking again, it was only in English. Concerned for her language development, Dieter started speaking English to his daughter while Susanne continued in German.
Today, when Susanne speaks to her daughter in German, she still answers in English. 'Or sometimes she speaks half and half. I checked with her teacher and she very seldom mixes up German and English at school. She speaks English like a New Zealander. It's her German that's behind,' says Susanne.
Professor Halford, also a mother of two bilingual children, says, 'It's normal for kids to refuse to speak their home language at the stage when they start to socialise with other kids in kindergarten or school'. But, she says, this depends a lot on the attitudes of the societies in question. In monolingual societies, like New Zealand, 'kids want to be like all the others and sometimes use bilingualism as one of the battlefields for finding their own identity in contrast to that of their parents.'
She supports Susanne's approach of not pressuring her daughter. 'Never force the child to use a specific language, just keep using it yourself. The child will accept that. There is often a time when children or teenagers will need to establish their own identity as different from their schoolmates and they may use their other language to do so.'
Cathie Elder thinks immigrant parents should only speak English to their children if they are able to use English well themselves. 'What parents should do is provide rich language experiences for their children in whatever language they speak well. They may feel like outsiders and want to speak the local language, but it is more important for the child's language development to provide a lot of language experience in any language.'
There can be differences between children in attitudes to learning languages. Susanne Dvorak's two-year-old son, Danyon, is already showing signs of speaking German and English equally well. While her 'ideal' scenario hasn't happened with Tiffany, she is aware that her daughter has a certain bilingual ability which, although mainly passive at this stage, may develop later on.
Joanne Powell feels the same way about her daughter, Ani. 'At the moment she may not want to speak Maori but that's okay because she'll pick it up again in her own time. It's more important that she has the ability to understand who she is. By learning another language she can open the door to another culture.'
Donna Chan, 25, a marketing specialist for IBM, arrived here with her parents from Hong Kong when she was four. She also remembers refusing to speak Chinese when she started primary school. But now she appreciates she had the chance to be bilingual. 'It's quite beneficial speaking another language in my job. Last year, my company sent me to a trade fair in Hong Kong because I could speak Chinese. Being bilingual definitely opens doors,' she says.
* Maori: the language spoken by the Maori people, the first native people of New Zealand
Questions 28–31
Do the following statements agree with the information given in the text?
TRUEif the statement agrees with the information
FALSEif the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVENif there is no information on this
28. Write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information, FALSE if the statement contradicts the information, or NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this. Most people who speak a second language in New Zealand were born in another country.
29. Write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information, FALSE if the statement contradicts the information, or NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this. Most New Zealanders believe it is good to teach children a second language.
30. Write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information, FALSE if the statement contradicts the information, or NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this. Chinese is the most common foreign language in New Zealand.
31. Write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information, FALSE if the statement contradicts the information, or NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this. Some languages develop your intelligence more than others.
Questions 32–38
Look at the following statements and the list of people below. Match each statement with the correct person, A–E. You may use any letter more than once.
People
A Cathie Elder
B Brigitte Halford
C Susanne Dvorak
D Joanne Powell
E Donna Chan
32. Children learning two languages may learn one language more slowly.
33. It has been unexpectedly difficult to raise a bilingual child in New Zealand.
34. Her daughter sometimes speaks a mixture of two languages.
35. Children's attitudes to language depend on general social attitudes.
36. It is not important which language parents speak with their children.
37. Learning a second language provides opportunities to learn another culture.
38. Speaking a second language provides work opportunities.
Questions 39–40
Choose TWO letters, A–F.
39. Which TWO people stopped speaking one language as a child? Person selection (lower letter)
A Donna Chan
B Susanne Dvorak
C Tiffany Dvorak
D Cathie Elder
E Brigitte Halford
F Joanne Powell
40. Which TWO people stopped speaking one language as a child? Person selection (higher letter)
A Donna Chan
B Susanne Dvorak
C Tiffany Dvorak
D Cathie Elder
E Brigitte Halford
F Joanne Powell
Questions 41–42
Choose TWO letters, A–F.
41. Which TWO people think that their children's language may develop as they get older? Person selection (lower letter)
A Donna Chan
B Susanne Dvorak
C Tiffany Dvorak
D Cathie Elder
E Brigitte Halford
F Joanne Powell
42. Which TWO people think that their children's language may develop as they get older? Person selection (higher letter)
A Donna Chan
B Susanne Dvorak
C Tiffany Dvorak
D Cathie Elder
E Brigitte Halford
F Joanne Powell
Answers
1. True
2. False
3. False
4. False
5. Not Given
6. True
7. Not Given
8. True
9. make a phone call
10. a system for registering people's card details.
11. get in touch with the relevant credit card companies.
12. a blank unsigned cheque.
13. pay for anything the thief buys on it.
14. You may have to pay up to £50 of any stolen money.
15. an audit
16. duplex printers
17. educational posters
18. regular newsletters
19. writing notes
20. ceramic mugs
21. charities
22. politicians
23. formula
24. company employees
25. shareholder reports
26. lies
27. benefited
28. True
29. Not Given
30. Not Given
31. False
32. A
33. C
34. C
35. B
36. A
37. D
38. E
39. Donna Chan
40. Tiffany Dvorak
41. Susanne Dvorak
42. Joanne Powell
Explanations
- 1. True
- The passage says you have a right to insist on a refund for faulty shoes returned at once, and it is 'also likely' you will get one if you simply change your mind and take the shoes back immediately (with proof of purchase, i.e. a receipt).Common trap: Faulty vs. unwanted trap — the question asks about unwanted (not faulty) shoes; the passage confirms a refund is 'likely' in this case too, provided it is done straightaway.
- 2. False
- The passage explicitly states the opposite: a customer does not have to accept a credit note if offered one, and doing so may leave them stuck with a note they cannot use.Common trap: Negation trap — the statement claims the customer is 'advised to accept', but the passage says they are not obliged to accept it at all.
- 3. False
- The passage directly contradicts this: it warns not to be put off by a shop's claim that it is the manufacturer's (factory's) responsibility, stating clearly that this 'isn't true' — it is the shop's legal duty.Common trap: Responsibility-shifting trap — shops sometimes claim the manufacturer is responsible, but the passage names this claim as false.
- 4. False
- The passage says only shops covered by the Footwear Code of Practice can be asked to do this — 'most' shops are covered, but not necessarily 'any' shop, so the claim of universality is false.Common trap: 'Most' vs. 'any' trap — the passage limits this right to shops covered by the Code, not to every shoe shop.
- 5. Not Given
- The passage explains what happens if a credit note is offered, but never states or implies that shops prefer offering a credit note over exchanging the shoes for different ones.Common trap: Unstated preference trap — the passage describes the consequences of a credit note but never compares it to shops' preferences over exchanging goods.
- 6. True
- The passage states the customer pays part of the £21 testing charge (£7), while the shop pays the remainder, confirming the customer does contribute to the cost.Common trap: Full-cost trap — a careless reading might assume the shop pays entirely; the passage shows the cost is shared, with the customer paying a smaller share.
- 7. Not Given
- The passage only states that the small claims limit differs in Scotland (£750 versus £1000), not that the actual procedure is any easier or harder there.Common trap: Different limit vs. different ease trap — a different claim ceiling in Scotland does not mean the procedure itself is easier.
- 8. True
- The passage confirms that some bookshops sell advice packs containing the relevant forms, which matches the claim that forms (and by extension related advice) can be bought from certain shops.Common trap: Source trap — advice/forms are also available free from the Citizens Advice Bureau, but the question only asks whether they can also be bought from shops, which is confirmed.
- 9. make a phone call
- Correct. The passage instructs you to 'telephone the credit card company or bank as soon as possible' — a phone call is the very first action.Common trap: Sequence trap — a letter and the police are both mentioned, but only as follow-up actions after the initial phone call.
- 10. a system for registering people's card details.
- Correct. The passage describes it as a 'central registration scheme' under which customers 'file details of all your cards' with a central registry.Common trap: Function trap — the scheme is a registration/notification service, not an insurer or a card-recovery agency.
- 11. get in touch with the relevant credit card companies.
- Correct. The passage states the scheme's staff 'make sure that all the companies whose cards you had are notified' once you call.Common trap: Who-is-notified trap — the notification goes to the card-issuing companies, not to shops or the police.
- 12. a blank unsigned cheque.
- Correct. The passage says you are only liable if you have 'been careless – by signing blank cheques, say' — an unsigned blank cheque involves no such carelessness, so 'the bank or shop that accepts them will have to bear the loss' in full.Common trap: Signed vs. unsigned trap — a signed blank cheque is treated as careless (partial liability), while a genuinely blank, unsigned cheque leaves the customer with no liability at all.
- 13. pay for anything the thief buys on it.
- Correct. The passage says the normal £50 limit is removed if 'the bank can prove gross negligence, such as writing your personal identification number on your card' — meaning you could be liable for the full amount taken.Common trap: Capped-liability trap — the usual £50 cap on cash-card losses is explicitly removed in the one case of gross negligence, such as writing down the PIN.
- 14. You may have to pay up to £50 of any stolen money.
- Correct. The passage states you 'can be made to pay back any sums a thief withdraws using your card, but only up to the time you report the loss and up to £50'.Common trap: Liability-cap trap — liability is capped at £50 and ends once the loss is reported, not open-ended or total.
- 15. an audit
- The passage states that a waste audit should be performed before starting a recycling scheme.Common trap: Timing trap — the audit must come before the scheme starts, not alongside or after it.
- 16. duplex printers
- The passage says paper costs can be reduced 'by lowering consumption and using duplex printers'.Common trap: Two-cause trap — lowering consumption is also mentioned, but only 'duplex printers' answers the question about machines.
- 17. educational posters
- The passage recommends 'putting up educational posters' to raise internal awareness.Common trap: Method trap — newsletters are also mentioned elsewhere in the passage, but they motivate staff rather than being 'displayed' to raise initial awareness.
- 18. regular newsletters
- The passage suggests sending out 'regular newsletters reporting on all waste improvements' to increase motivation.Common trap: Posters vs. newsletters trap — posters raise awareness, but newsletters are the item specifically 'sent out' to motivate ongoing staff involvement.
- 19. writing notes
- The passage says waste paper 'can serve a variety of purposes before it is recycled, such as writing notes'.Common trap: Envelope trap — envelopes are also mentioned as reusable for internal mail, but the specific use given for paper itself is writing notes.
- 20. ceramic mugs
- The passage recommends buying 'ceramic mugs that can be re-used' instead of disposable plastic cups.Common trap: Disposable vs. reusable trap — plastic cups are the source of the waste; ceramic mugs are the reusable item that should be bought instead.
- 21. charities
- The passage suggests 'donating your old computers to charities when it comes to replacing them'.Common trap: Upgrade vs. donate trap — upgrading equipment is discussed first, but donation to charities is the specific answer to where unwanted PCs can be sent.
- 22. politicians
- The passage contrasts job candidates, who 'must answer employers' queries', with 'some politicians, who take no notice of press questions and immediately introduce a different topic in response'.Common trap: Contrast trap — politicians are cited as the bad example candidates should NOT imitate, not as a model to follow.
- 23. formula
- The passage describes the 'formula Q = A + 1' that candidates are advised to apply so they can bridge from the answer to their intended message.Common trap: Terminology trap — 'Q = A + 1' is an example of the formula, not the answer itself; the word tested is 'formula'.
- 24. company employees
- The passage advises candidates to 'ask company employees questions prior to job interviews to gain as much insight as you can'.Common trap: Source trap — shareholder reports are also a source of information (tested separately in Q25), but this question asks about people to be asked directly, i.e. company employees.
- 25. shareholder reports
- The passage says that if the company is publicly owned, a candidate can 'find out how viable it is by reading shareholder reports'.Common trap: Condition trap — this applies specifically to publicly owned companies, but the document to study is shareholder reports.
- 26. lies
- Ms Murphy, president of the Murphy Group, 'says that it's important to steer clear of lies at all costs' when discussing a past mistake.Common trap: Avoidance trap — the advice is to avoid telling lies, not to avoid discussing the mistake itself.
- 27. benefited
- Mr Friedmann explained in his interview 'how I'd benefited in many ways from going through that experience' of a failed turnaround.Common trap: Success vs. failure trap — the executive discussed a failure, but the point he made was about how he had benefited from it, not the failure itself.
- 28. True
- The passage says that of the small number of New Zealanders who claim to speak two or more languages, only 'a small percentage' were born in New Zealand — implying the majority of that group were born elsewhere.Common trap: Double-negative-style trap — 'a small percentage born in New Zealand' has to be read as implying most were born abroad, the reverse of a careless first reading.
- 29. Not Given
- The passage reports that 'the general agreement among experts' is that a second language is good for children, but it never states what most ordinary New Zealanders themselves believe.Common trap: Experts vs. general public trap — the positive view described belongs to language experts, not to New Zealanders as a whole.
- 30. Not Given
- Chinese is mentioned only as one example language among several (Maori, German, Chinese, 'or any other language'); the passage never ranks languages by how commonly they are spoken in New Zealand.Common trap: Example-list trap — Chinese appears in a list of example languages, which is not evidence about its relative popularity.
- 31. False
- The passage explicitly states that the learning advantage 'depends on how much of each language they can speak, not on which language is used', directly contradicting the idea that some languages are more beneficial than others.Common trap: Amount vs. type trap — the benefit depends on the amount of language learned, not on which particular language it is.
- 32. A
- Cathie Elder says: 'A lot of studies have shown that children who speak more than one language sometimes learn one language more slowly, but in the end they do as well as their monolingual schoolmates, and often better, in other subjects.'Common trap: Short-term vs. long-term trap — the slower learning is only temporary; Elder also says bilingual children eventually catch up and often do better, which could tempt a reader towards a different name.
- 33. C
- Susanne Dvorak expected raising Tiffany as a bilingual to be straightforward, having 'read all the books she could find on the subject', but Tiffany 'stopped talking completely' at nursery school and later spoke only English — an unexpected difficulty.Common trap: Expectation vs. reality trap — Susanne's plan and preparation ('perfect opportunity', having read the books) contrast with the actual difficulty she encountered.
- 34. C
- Susanne Dvorak reports that her daughter 'sometimes she speaks half and half', i.e. a mixture of German and English.Common trap: Person-confusion trap — several mothers in the passage discuss their daughters, but only Susanne describes an actual mixing of the two languages.
- 35. B
- Brigitte Halford states that children's reluctance to speak their home language 'depends a lot on the attitudes of the societies in question'.Common trap: Individual vs. societal trap — the statement is about society-wide attitudes, which Halford (not a parent describing her own child) is the one to make.
- 36. A
- Cathie Elder argues that 'it is more important for the child's language development to provide a lot of language experience in any language' than to worry about which specific language is used.Common trap: Which-language vs. how-much trap — Elder's point is that the amount of language experience matters, not the particular language chosen.
- 37. D
- Joanne Powell says of her daughter Ani: 'By learning another language she can open the door to another culture.'Common trap: Similar-sentiment trap — several speakers list benefits of bilingualism, but the specific 'door to another culture' idea belongs to Joanne Powell.
- 38. E
- Donna Chan explains that speaking Chinese was 'quite beneficial' in her job, since her company sent her to a trade fair in Hong Kong because of her language skill.Common trap: General benefit vs. specific work benefit trap — several speakers mention general benefits of bilingualism, but the concrete work opportunity is Donna Chan's.
- 39. Donna Chan
- Correct. Donna Chan 'remembers refusing to speak Chinese when she started primary school.'Common trap: Parent-vs-child trap — Susanne Dvorak and Joanne Powell are parents describing their children's language behaviour, not people who themselves stopped speaking a language.
- 40. Tiffany Dvorak
- Correct. Tiffany Dvorak 'stopped talking completely' when she started nursery school, and afterwards spoke only English.Common trap: Parent-vs-child trap — Susanne Dvorak and Joanne Powell are parents describing their children's language behaviour, not people who themselves stopped speaking a language.
- 41. Susanne Dvorak
- Correct. Susanne Dvorak is aware that Tiffany 'has a certain bilingual ability which, although mainly passive at this stage, may develop later on.'Common trap: Present-ability vs. future-development trap — the question asks who expects further development later on, distinct from Q34's point about Susanne's daughter already mixing languages.
- 42. Joanne Powell
- Correct. Joanne Powell 'feels the same way about her daughter, Ani', saying Ani 'may not want to speak Maori but that's okay because she'll pick it up again in her own time.'Common trap: Present-ability vs. future-development trap — Joanne Powell's comment about Ani 'picking it up again' parallels Susanne's point about Tiffany, distinguishing it from Q37's separate point about learning a culture.
Comments
Loading comments…