Cambridge IELTS 19 Academic Reading Test 4
3 passages · 40 questions · 60 minutes
The impact of climate change on butterflies in Britain
According to conservationists, populations of around two thirds of butterfly species have declined in Britain over the past 40 years. If this trend continues, it might have unpredictable knock-on effects for other species in the ecosystem. Butterfly eggs develop into caterpillars and these insects, which are the second stage in a new butterfly's lifecycle, consume vast quantities of plant material, and in turn act as prey for birds as well as bats and other small mammals. Only by arming themselves with an understanding of why butterfly numbers are down can conservationists hope to halt or reverse the decline.
Butterflies prefer outdoor conditions to be "just right", which means neither too hot nor too cold. Under the conditions of climate change, the temperature at any given time in summer is generally getting warmer, leaving butterflies with the challenge of how to deal with this. One of the main ways in which species are ensuring conditions suit them is by changing the time of year at which they are active and reproduce. Scientists refer to the timing of such lifecycle events as "phenology", so when an animal or plant starts to do something earlier in the year than it usually does, it is said to be "advancing its phenology".
These advances have been observed already in a wide range of butterflies - indeed, most species are advancing their phenology to some extent. In Britain, as the average spring temperature has increased by roughly 0.5°C over the past 20 years, species have advanced by between three days and a week on average, to keep in line with cooler temperatures. Is this a sign that butterflies are well equipped to cope with climate change, and readily adjust to new temperatures? Or are these populations under stress, being dragged along unwillingly by unnaturally fast changes? The answer is still unknown, but a new study is seeking to answer these questions.
First, the researchers pulled together data from millions of records that had been submitted by butterfly enthusiasts - people who spend their free time observing the activities of different species. This provided information on 130 species of butterflies in Great Britain every year for a 20-year period. They then estimated the abundance and distribution of each species across this time, along with how far north in the country they had moved. The data also, crucially, allowed researchers to estimate subtle changes in what time of the year each species was changing into an adult butterfly.
Analysing the trends in each variable, the researchers discovered that species with more flexible lifecycles were more likely to be able to benefit from an earlier emergence driven by climate change. Some species are able to go from caterpillar to butterfly twice or more per year, so that the individual butterflies you see flying in the spring are the grandchildren or great-grandchildren of the individuals seen a year previously.
Among these species, researchers observed that those which have been advancing their phenology the most over the 20-year study period also had the most positive trends in abundance, distribution and northwards extent. For these species, such as Britain's tiniest butterfly, the dainty Small Blue, whose colonies are up to a hundred strong, some develop into butterflies early in spring, allowing their summer generations to complete another reproductive cycle by autumn so that more population growth occurs.
Other species, however, are less flexible and restricted to a single reproductive cycle per year. For these species, there was no evidence of any benefit to emerging earlier. Indeed, worryingly, it was found that the species in this group that specialise in very specific habitat types, often related to the caterpillar's preferred diet, actually tended to be most at harm from advancing phenology. The beautiful High Brown Fritillary, often described as Britain's most endangered butterfly, is in this group. It is found only in coppiced woodland and limestone pavement habitats. It is also a single-generation butterfly that has advanced its phenology. This suggests that climate change, while undoubtedly not the sole cause, might have played a part in the downfall of this species.
All is not lost, however. Many of Britain's single-generation species show the capacity, in continental Europe, to add a second generation in years that are sufficiently warm. Therefore, as the climate continues to warm, species like the Silver-studded Blue might be able to switch to multiple generations in the UK as well, and so begin to extract benefits from the additional warmth, potentially leading to population increases.
More immediately, conservationists can arm themselves with all this knowledge to spot the warning signs of species that may be at risk. The White Admiral of southern England, a much sought-after butterfly, experienced a significant increase in numbers from the 1920s but has shown a considerable decline in the past 20 years. This may be because the caterpillar exists solely on a diet of a plant called honeysuckle. But it is also likely to be due to climate change.
Questions 1–6
Do the following statements agree with the information given in the passage?
TRUEif the statement agrees with the information
FALSEif the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVENif there is no information on this
1. Forty years ago, there were fewer butterflies in Britain than at present.
2. Caterpillars are eaten by a number of different predators.
3. 'Phenology' is a term used to describe a creature's ability to alter the location of a lifecycle event.
4. Some species of butterfly have a reduced lifespan due to spring temperature increases.
5. There is a clear reason for the adaptations that butterflies are making to climate change.
6. The data used in the study was taken from the work of amateur butterfly watchers.
Questions 7–13
Complete the notes below. Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.
Butterflies in the UK
The Small Blue
• lives in large (7) …………………………
• first appears at the start of (8) …………………………
• completes more than one reproductive cycle per year
The High Brown Fritillary
• has one reproductive cycle
• is considered to be more (9) ………………………… than other species
• its caterpillars occupy a limited range of (10) …………………………
The Silver-studded Blue
is already able to reproduce twice a year in warm areas of (11) …………………………
The White Admiral
• is found in (12) ………………………… areas of England
• both climate change and the (13) ………………………… of the caterpillar are possible reasons for decline.
Deep-sea mining
[A] When Professor Mat Upton found that a microbe from a deep-sea sponge was killing pathogenic bugs in his laboratory, he realised it could be a breakthrough in the fight against antibiotic-resistant superbugs, which are responsible for thousands of deaths a year in the UK alone. Further tests confirmed that an antibiotic from the sponge bacteria, found living more than 700 metres under the sea at the Rockall trough in the north-east Atlantic, was previously unknown to science, boosting its potential as a life-saving medicine. But Upton, and other scientists who view the deep ocean and its wealth of unique and undocumented species as a prospecting ground for new medicines, fear such potential will be lost in the rush to exploit the deep sea's equally rich metal and mineral resources.
[B] "We're looking at the bioactive potential of marine resources, to see if there are any more medicines or drugs down there before we destroy it for ever," says Upton, a medical microbiologist at the University of Plymouth. He is among many scientists urging a halt to deep-sea mining, asking for time to weigh up the pros and cons. "In sustainability terms, this could be a better way of exploiting the economic potential of the deep sea," he argues. Oceanographers using remotely operated vehicles have spotted many new species. Among them have been sea cucumbers with tails allowing them to sail along the ocean floor, and a rare "Dumbo" octopus, found 3,000 metres under the Pacific Ocean, off the coast of California. Any one of these could offer lifesaving potential. Upton estimates it could take up to a decade for a newly discovered antibiotic to become a medicine - but the race towards commercial mining in the ocean abyss has already begun.
[C] The deep sea contains more nickel, cobalt and rare earth metals than all land reserves combined, according to the US Geological Survey. Mining corporations argue that deep-sea exploration could help diversify the supply of metals and point to the fact that demand for resources such as copper, aluminium, cobalt for electric car batteries and other metals to power technology and smartphones, is soaring. They say that deep-sea mining could yield far superior ore to land mining with little, if any, waste. Different methods of extraction exist, but most involve employing some form of converted machinery previously used in terrestrial mining to excavate materials from the sea floor, at depths of up to 6,000 metres, then drawing a seawater slurry, containing rock and other solid particles, from the sea floor to ships on the surface. The slurry is then "de-watered" and transferred to another vessel for shipping. Extracted seawater is pumped back down and discharged close to the sea floor.
[D] But environmental and legal groups have urged caution, arguing there are potentially massive and unknown ramifications for the environment and for nearby communities, and that the global regulatory framework is not yet drafted. "Despite arising in the last half century, the 'new global gold rush' of deep-sea mining shares many features with past resource scrambles - including a general disregard for environmental and social impacts, and the marginalisation of indigenous peoples and their rights," a paper, written by Julie Hunter and Julian Aguon, from Blue Ocean Law, and Pradeep Singh, from the Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, Bremen, argues. The authors say that knowledge of the deep seabed remains extremely limited. "The surface of the Moon, Mars and even Venus have all been mapped and studied in much greater detail, leading marine scientists to commonly remark that, with respect to the deep sea, 'We don't yet know what we need to know'."
[E] Scientific research - including a recent paper in Marine Policy journal - has suggested the deep seabed, and hydrothermal vents, which are created when seawater meets volcanic magma, have crucial impacts upon biodiversity and the global climate. The mineral-rich vents and their surrounds are also home to many well-known animals including crustaceans, tubeworms, clams, slugs, anemones and fish. "It is becoming increasingly clear that deep-sea mining poses a grave threat to these vital seabed functions," the paper says. "Extraction methods would produce large sediment plumes and involve the discharge of waste back into the ocean, significantly disturbing seafloor environments," the paper continues. "On deep sea vents, scientists are clear," says Dr Jon Copley of the National Oceanography Centre, Southampton: "we don't want mining on them."
[F] The oceans occupy around 70% of the planet and are relatively unexplored, says Mike Johnston, chief executive of Nautilus, a Canadian underwater exploration company: "It makes sense to explore this untapped potential in an environmentally sustainable way, instead of continually looking at the fast depleting land resources of the planet to meet society's rising needs." Those leading the global rush to place giant mining machines thousands of metres below the sea surface say the environmental impacts will be far lower than on land. But critics say exotic and little-known ecosystems in the deep oceans could be destroyed and must be protected. "Mining will be the greatest assault on deep-sea ecosystems ever inflicted by humans," according to hydrothermal vent expert Verena Tunnicliffe, at the University of Victoria in Canada. She argues that active vents must be off-limits for mining to protect the new knowledge and biotechnology spin-offs they can deliver, and that strict controls must be in place elsewhere.
Questions 14–17
Reading Passage 2 has six paragraphs, A–F. Which paragraph contains the following information? Choose the correct letter, A–F.
14. reference to the rapidly increasing need for one raw material in the transport industry
15. a rough estimate of the area of the Earth covered by the oceans
16. how a particular underwater habitat, where minerals and organisms co-exist, is formed
17. reference to the fact that the countries of the world have yet to agree on rules for the exploration of the seabed
Questions 18–23
Look at the following statements and the list of people below. Match each statement with the correct person or people, A–E. You may use any letter more than once.
List of People
A Professor Mat Upton
B Julie Hunter, Julian Aguon and Pradeep Singh
C Dr Jon Copley
D Mike Johnston
E Verena Tunnicliffe
18. A move away from the exploration of heavily mined reserves on land is a good idea.
19. The negative effects of undersea exploration on local areas and their inhabitants are being ignored.
20. There are more worthwhile things to extract from the sea than minerals.
21. No other form of human exploration will have such a destructive impact on marine life as deep-sea mining.
22. More is known about outer space than about what lies beneath the oceans.
23. There is one marine life habitat where experts agree mining should not take place.
Questions 24–26
Complete the summary below. Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.
24. Mining the sea floor Mining corporations believe that the mineral resources lying under the sea may be superior to those found in the earth. They also say that these can be removed without producing much ………………………….
25. The extraction is often done by adapting the ………………………… that has already been used to work on land.
26. The method of excavation involves removing the seawater from the slurry that is brought up to ships and returning it to the seabed. However, concerned groups strongly believe that ………………………… is necessary due to the possible number of unidentified consequences.
The Unselfish Gene
There has long been a general assumption that human beings are essentially selfish. We're apparently ruthless, with strong impulses to compete against each other for resources and to accumulate power and possessions. If we are kind to one another, it's usually because we have ulterior motives. If we are good, it's only because we have managed to control and transcend our innate selfishness and brutality.
This bleak view of human nature is closely associated with the science writer Richard Dawkins, whose 1976 book "The Selfish Gene" became popular because it fitted so well with - and helped to justify - the competitive and individualistic ethos that was so prevalent in late 20th-century societies. Like many others, Dawkins justifies his views with reference to the field of evolutionary psychology. Evolutionary psychology theorises that present-day human traits developed in prehistoric times, during what is termed the "environment of evolutionary adaptedness".
Prehistory is usually seen as a period of intense competition, when life was such a brutal battle that only those with traits such as selfishness, aggression and ruthlessness survived. And because survival depended on access to resources - such as rivers, forests and animals - there was bound to be conflict between rival groups, which led to the development of traits such as racism and warfare. This seems logical. But, in fact, the assumption on which this all rests - that prehistoric life was a desperate struggle for survival - is false.
It's important to remember that in the prehistoric era, the world was very sparsely populated. According to some estimates, around 15,000 years ago, the population of Europe was only 29,000, and the population of the whole world was less than half a million. Humans at that time were hunter-gatherers: people who lived by hunting wild animals and collecting wild plants. With such small population densities, it seems unlikely that prehistoric hunter-gatherer groups had to compete against each other for resources or had any need to develop ruthlessness and competitiveness, or to go to war.
There is significant evidence to back this notion from contemporary hunter-gatherer groups, who live in the same way as prehistoric humans did. As the anthropologist Bruce Knauft has remarked, hunter-gatherers are characterised by "extreme political and sexual egalitarianism". Knauft has observed that individuals in such groups don't accumulate property or possessions and have an ethical obligation to share everything. They also have methods of preserving egalitarianism by ensuring that disparities of status don't arise.
The “!Kung” people of southern Africa, for example, swap arrows before going hunting and when an animal is killed, the acclaim does not go to the person who fired the arrow, but to the person the arrow belongs to. And if a person becomes too domineering, the other members of the group ostracise them, exiling the offender from society. Typically in such groups, men do not dictate what women do. Women in hunter-gatherer groups worldwide often benefit from a high level of autonomy, being able to select their own marriage partners, decide what work they do and work whenever they choose to. And if a marriage breaks down, they have custody rights over their children.
Many anthropologists believe that societies such as the “!Kung” were normal until a few thousand years ago, when population growth led to the development of agriculture and a settled lifestyle. In view of the above, there seems little reason to assume that traits such as racism, warfare and male domination should have been selected by evolution - as they would have been of little benefit in the prehistoric era. Individuals who behaved selfishly and ruthlessly would be less likely to survive, since they would have been ostracised from their groups.
It makes more sense, then, to see traits such as cooperation, egalitarianism, altruism and peacefulness as innate characteristics of human beings. These were the traits that were prevalent in human life for tens of thousands of years. So presumably these traits are still strong in us now.
But if prehistoric life wasn't really as brutal as has often been assumed, why do modern humans behave so selfishly and ruthlessly? Perhaps these negative traits should be seen as a later development, the result of environmental and psychological factors. Research has shown repeatedly that when the natural habitats of primates such as apes and gorillas are disrupted, they tend to become more violent and hierarchical.
So, it could well be that the same thing has happened to us. I believe that the end of the hunter-gatherer lifestyle and the advent of farming was connected to a psychological change that occurred in some groups of people. There was a new sense of individuality and separateness, which led to a new selfishness, and ultimately to hierarchical societies, patriarchy and warfare. At any rate, these negative traits appear to have developed so recently that it doesn't seem feasible to explain them in adaptive or evolutionary terms.
Questions 27–30
Choose the correct letter.
27. What is the writer doing in the first paragraph?
A setting out two opposing views about human nature
B justifying his opinion about our tendency to be greedy
C describing a commonly held belief about people's behaviour
D explaining why he thinks that humans act in a selfish manner
28. What point is made about Richard Dawkins' book The Selfish Gene?
A Its appeal lay in the radical nature of its ideas.
B Its success was due to the scientific support it offered.
C It presented a view that was in line with the attitudes of its time.
D It took an innovative approach to the analysis of human psychology.
29. What does the writer suggest about the prehistoric era in the fourth paragraph?
A Societies were more complex than many people believe.
B Supplies of natural resources were probably relatively plentiful.
C Most estimates about population sizes are likely to be inaccurate.
D Humans moved across continents more than was previously thought.
30. The writer refers to Bruce Knauft's work as support for the idea that
A selfishness is a relatively recent development in human societies.
B only people in isolated communities can live in an unselfish manner.
C very few lifestyles have survived unchanged since prehistoric times.
D hunter-gatherer cultures worldwide are declining in number.
Questions 31–35
Complete the summary below. Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.
31. Contemporary hunter-gatherer societies Bruce Knauft's research shows that contemporary hunter-gatherer societies tend to exhibit a high level of ………………………… in all areas of life.
32. In these cultures, distributing resources fairly among all members is a moral obligation. These societies also employ strategies to prevent differences in ………………………… occurring:
33. for example, the “!Kung” follow a custom whereby the credit for one person's success at ………………………… is given to another member of the group.
34. Individuals who behave in a ………………………… manner are punished by being excluded from the group,
35. and women have a considerable amount of ………………………… in choices regarding work and marriage.
Questions 36–40
Do the following statements agree with the views of the writer?
YESif the statement agrees with the views of the writer
NOif the statement contradicts the views of the writer
NOT GIVENif it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
36. Some anthropologists are mistaken about the point when the number of societies such as the “!Kung” began to decline.
37. Humans who developed warlike traits in prehistory would have had an advantage over those who did not.
38. Being peaceful and cooperative is a natural way for people to behave.
39. Negative traits are more apparent in some modern cultures than in others.
40. Animal research has failed to reveal a link between changes in the environment and the emergence of aggressive tendencies.
Answers
1. False
2. True
3. False
4. Not Given
5. False
6. True
7. colonies
8. spring
9. endangered
10. habitats
11. Europe
12. southern
13. diet
14. C
15. F
16. E
17. D
18. D
19. B
20. A
21. E
22. B
23. C
24. waste
25. machinery
26. caution
27. describing a commonly held belief about people's behaviour
28. It presented a view that was in line with the attitudes of its time.
29. Supplies of natural resources were probably relatively plentiful.
30. selfishness is a relatively recent development in human societies.
31. egalitarianism
32. status
33. hunting
34. domineering
35. autonomy
36. Not Given
37. No
38. Yes
39. Not Given
40. No
Explanations
- 1. False
- The statement claims there were FEWER butterflies 40 years ago than now, implying numbers have grown. The passage says the opposite: "populations of around two thirds of butterfly species have declined in Britain over the past 40 years." A decline over 40 years means there were MORE butterflies 40 years ago, not fewer, directly contradicting the statement.Common trap: Reversed-truth (direction-of-change) trap
- 2. True
- The passage explicitly lists multiple predator types: caterpillars "act as prey for birds as well as bats and other small mammals." Three distinct predator categories (birds, bats, other small mammals) directly support "a number of different predators."Common trap: None significant — direct match
- 3. False
- The passage defines phenology purely in terms of TIMING, not location: "Scientists refer to the timing of such lifecycle events as 'phenology'." The statement substitutes "location" for "timing" — a different concept entirely (where something happens vs. when it happens) — making this FALSE rather than a simple missing-information case.Common trap: Concept-substitution trap (location swapped in for timing — two different dimensions of change)
- 4. Not Given
- The passage discusses butterflies advancing their phenology — appearing earlier in the year — in response to warmer spring temperatures. It never discusses lifespan (how long an individual butterfly lives) being shortened. "Appearing earlier" and "living for a shorter time" are different concepts, and the passage only addresses the former.Common trap: Concept-substitution trap (timing-of-emergence is not the same as lifespan, but the two could be confused on a quick read)
- 5. False
- The passage poses two competing explanations (butterflies coping well vs. being under stress) and explicitly states, "The answer is still unknown, but a new study is seeking to answer these questions." "Still unknown" directly contradicts "there is a clear reason."Common trap: Reversed-truth (certainty vs. uncertainty) trap
- 6. True
- The passage describes the data source as "millions of records that had been submitted by butterfly enthusiasts - people who spend their free time observing the activities of different species." "Free time" and "enthusiasts" (rather than paid professionals) directly support "amateur."Common trap: None significant — direct paraphrase match ("enthusiasts... free time" = "amateur... watchers")
- 7. colonies
- The note describes the Small Blue's group size. The passage states it is "the dainty Small Blue, whose colonies are up to a hundred strong." "Colonies... a hundred strong" directly matches "lives in large colonies."Common trap: None significant — direct lift of the keyword
- 8. spring
- The note asks when the Small Blue first appears. The passage states, "some develop into butterflies early in spring." "Early in" matches "at the start of," giving "spring" as the answer.Common trap: None significant — direct lift of the keyword
- 9. endangered
- The note describes the High Brown Fritillary's conservation status relative to others. The passage states it is "often described as Britain's most endangered butterfly." "Most endangered" directly matches "more endangered than other species."Common trap: None significant — direct lift of the keyword
- 10. habitats
- The note asks what limited range the caterpillars are confined to. The passage states the species "is found only in coppiced woodland and limestone pavement habitats." "Found only in" matches "occupy a limited range of," giving "habitats" as the answer.Common trap: None significant — direct lift of the keyword
- 11. Europe
- The note asks where this species already manages two reproductive cycles a year in warm years. The passage states, "Many of Britain's single-generation species show the capacity, in continental Europe, to add a second generation in years that are sufficiently warm." "Continental Europe" gives the answer.Common trap: None significant — direct lift of the keyword
- 12. southern
- The note asks which part of England the White Admiral is found in. The passage states, "The White Admiral of southern England." This is a direct lift of the location.Common trap: None significant — direct lift of the keyword
- 13. diet
- The note asks what caterpillar-related factor, alongside climate change, might explain the decline. The passage states, "This may be because the caterpillar exists solely on a diet of a plant called honeysuckle. But it is also likely to be due to climate change." The note reverses the passage's order (diet first, then climate change), but both causes are the same two named in the passage — "diet" is the missing word.Common trap: Order-reversal trap — the summary lists the two causes in the opposite order to the passage (diet first here, climate change first in the passage); don't let the reordering cause confusion about which word goes where
- 14. C
- The question asks about rapidly rising demand for a material tied to transport. Paragraph C states demand for "copper, aluminium, cobalt for electric car batteries and other metals to power technology and smartphones, is soaring." Among the materials listed, cobalt is specifically tied to electric car batteries — the transport-industry link the question asks for — while "soaring" matches "rapidly increasing."Common trap: Multiple-items-one-target trap (several materials are listed together, but only cobalt/electric car batteries is tied to transport specifically — copper, aluminium and the smartphone-related metals relate to general technology demand instead)
- 15. F
- The question asks for an estimated proportion of Earth covered by ocean. Paragraph F gives the statistic directly: "The oceans occupy around 70% of the planet." "Around" signals this is an estimate, matching "a rough estimate."Common trap: None significant
- 16. E
- The question asks how a mineral-rich, life-hosting habitat forms. Paragraph E explains that "hydrothermal vents... are created when seawater meets volcanic magma," describing them as "mineral-rich" and home to "many well-known animals including crustaceans, tubeworms, clams, slugs, anemones and fish" — directly matching "minerals and organisms co-exist" and explaining the formation process.Common trap: None significant
- 17. D
- The question asks about a lack of agreed international rules. Paragraph D states, "the global regulatory framework is not yet drafted." "Not yet drafted" directly matches "have yet to agree on rules."Common trap: None significant
- 18. D
- The statement asks who favours shifting away from land mining. Johnston argues it "makes sense to explore this untapped potential [the ocean]... instead of continually looking at the fast depleting land resources of the planet." "Fast depleting land resources" matches "heavily mined reserves on land," and he frames the shift to ocean exploration positively.Common trap: None significant
- 19. B
- The statement asks who highlights ignored harm to local communities. Hunter, Aguon and Singh's paper states deep-sea mining shares "a general disregard for environmental and social impacts, and the marginalisation of indigenous peoples and their rights." "Disregard" matches "being ignored," and "marginalisation of indigenous peoples" matches "local areas and their inhabitants."Common trap: None significant
- 20. A
- The statement asks who values something above minerals. Upton and like-minded scientists view the deep ocean as "a prospecting ground for new medicines" and fear this potential "will be lost in the rush to exploit the deep sea's equally rich metal and mineral resources" — implying medicines/bioactive compounds are seen as more valuable than minerals.Common trap: None significant
- 21. E
- The statement asks who claims deep-sea mining is uniquely destructive. Tunnicliffe states, "Mining will be the greatest assault on deep-sea ecosystems ever inflicted by humans" — "greatest assault... ever inflicted" directly supports "no other form... will have such a destructive impact."Common trap: None significant
- 22. B
- The statement asks who compares space knowledge to deep-sea knowledge. Hunter, Aguon and Singh's paper states, "The surface of the Moon, Mars and even Venus have all been mapped and studied in much greater detail," leading to the remark "We don't yet know what we need to know" about the deep sea. This directly compares greater space knowledge to limited deep-sea knowledge.Common trap: None significant — the same source (B) as Q19, which is permitted since the list allows repeated use of letters
- 23. C
- The statement asks who names one specific habitat with expert consensus against mining. Copley states about deep sea vents specifically: "On deep sea vents, scientists are clear... we don't want mining on them." This names one habitat (vents) with stated expert consensus.Common trap: Overlapping-viewpoint trap (Tunnicliffe, in paragraph F, also argues active vents must be off-limits — a closely related point that could tempt E instead of C; the distinguishing detail is that Copley's quote is explicitly framed as "scientists are clear", i.e. expert consensus, while Tunnicliffe's statement is about the destructiveness of mining generally)
- 24. waste
- The summary asks what mining corporations claim isn't produced much of. The passage states, "deep-sea mining could yield far superior ore to land mining with little, if any, waste." "Little, if any, waste" matches "without producing much waste."Common trap: None significant — direct lift of the keyword
- 25. machinery
- The summary asks what land-mining equipment is repurposed. The passage states extraction "most involve[s] employing some form of converted machinery previously used in terrestrial mining to excavate materials from the sea floor." "Converted... previously used in terrestrial mining" matches "adapting... that has already been used to work on land."Common trap: None significant — direct lift of the keyword
- 26. caution
- The summary asks what concerned groups insist is necessary. The passage states, "environmental and legal groups have urged caution, arguing there are potentially massive and unknown ramifications." "Urged caution" matches "strongly believe that caution is necessary," and "unknown ramifications" matches "unidentified consequences."Common trap: None significant — direct lift of the keyword
- 27. describing a commonly held belief about people's behaviour
- The paragraph opens with "There has long been a general assumption that human beings are essentially selfish," followed by elaboration of this widely-held view. The writer is reporting an existing, commonly-held belief (signalled by "general assumption," "apparently") rather than arguing for it as their own position — the writer's own view, which challenges this assumption, comes later in the passage.Common trap: Voice-attribution trap (D — confusing a reported common belief with the writer's own argued position, since the confident tone could be misread as the writer's personal stance)
- 28. It presented a view that was in line with the attitudes of its time.
- The passage explains the book "became popular because it fitted so well with - and helped to justify - the competitive and individualistic ethos that was so prevalent in late 20th-century societies." This directly credits the book's success to matching prevailing social attitudes, not to novelty or scientific rigor.Common trap: Cause-vs-method confusion trap (B mistakes Dawkins' justification method for the passage's stated reason behind the book's success)
- 29. Supplies of natural resources were probably relatively plentiful.
- The paragraph notes extremely low population figures (Europe: 29,000; world: under half a million) and concludes "it seems unlikely that prehistoric hunter-gatherer groups had to compete against each other for resources." Low population plus no need to compete for resources implies those resources were not scarce relative to demand — i.e., "relatively plentiful."Common trap: Unsupported-claim trap (A, C, D — plausible-sounding ideas not actually discussed in this paragraph)
- 30. selfishness is a relatively recent development in human societies.
- Knauft's observations — that hunter-gatherers show "extreme political and sexual egalitarianism," don't accumulate property, and have "an ethical obligation to share everything" — are used by the writer to argue against the assumption that humans are innately selfish. Since these egalitarian, sharing-based societies represent how humans lived for most of human history, the implication is that selfishness is a later development, not an innate, evolutionarily-selected trait.Common trap: Unsupported-claim trap (B, C, D — plausible-sounding extrapolations beyond what Knauft's cited work actually shows)
- 31. egalitarianism
- The summary asks what quality is high across all areas of hunter-gatherer life. The passage states, "hunter-gatherers are characterised by 'extreme political and sexual egalitarianism'." "Political and sexual" (i.e. across different areas of life) matches "in all areas of life."Common trap: None significant — direct lift of the keyword
- 32. status
- The summary asks what kind of difference is prevented from arising. The passage states, "They also have methods of preserving egalitarianism by ensuring that disparities of status don't arise." "Disparities of status" directly matches "differences in status."Common trap: None significant — direct lift of the keyword
- 33. hunting
- The summary asks what activity the credited success relates to. The passage states, "The '!Kung' people... swap arrows before going hunting and when an animal is killed, the acclaim does not go to the person who fired the arrow, but to the person the arrow belongs to." The summary asks for the ACTIVITY ("success at _____"), which is "hunting" — not the object ("arrows") used in it, even though "arrows" appears prominently in the same sentence.Common trap: Object-vs-activity trap — 'arrows' is a tempting wrong word since it appears prominently in the same sentence, but the blank asks for the activity ('success at ___'), which is hunting
- 34. domineering
- The summary asks what kind of behaviour leads to exclusion. The passage states, "if a person becomes too domineering, the other members of the group ostracise them, exiling the offender from society." "Ostracise... exiling" matches "punished by being excluded," and "domineering" is the described behaviour.Common trap: None significant — direct lift of the keyword
- 35. autonomy
- The summary asks what quality gives women freedom over work and marriage choices. The passage states, "Women in hunter-gatherer groups worldwide often benefit from a high level of autonomy, being able to select their own marriage partners, decide what work they do and work whenever they choose to." "High level of autonomy" directly matches "considerable amount of autonomy."Common trap: None significant — direct lift of the keyword
- 36. Not Given
- The passage reports what "many anthropologists believe" (that such societies were normal until agriculture developed a few thousand years ago) but never evaluates whether any anthropologists are correct or mistaken about this timing. No judgment of accuracy is offered.Common trap: Unaddressed-evaluation trap (a belief is reported, but the statement asks whether it's mistaken — a judgment the passage never makes)
- 37. No
- The writer states there is "little reason to assume that traits such as racism, warfare and male domination should have been selected by evolution - as they would have been of little benefit in the prehistoric era," and adds that selfish, ruthless individuals "would be less likely to survive, since they would have been ostracised from their groups." This directly contradicts the idea that warlike traits gave an advantage — the opposite is argued.Common trap: Reversed-truth trap
- 38. Yes
- The writer states directly, "It makes more sense, then, to see traits such as cooperation, egalitarianism, altruism and peacefulness as innate characteristics of human beings." "Innate" is the direct paraphrase of "natural."Common trap: None significant
- 39. Not Given
- The writer discusses negative traits as a general "later development" affecting modern humans as a whole, resulting from "environmental and psychological factors," but never compares different modern cultures to say some show these traits more than others. This specific cross-cultural comparison is absent.Common trap: Unaddressed-comparison trap (the topic — negative traits in modern humans — is discussed generally, but the specific cross-cultural claim in the statement is never made)
- 40. No
- The passage states the opposite: "Research has shown repeatedly that when the natural habitats of primates such as apes and gorillas are disrupted, they tend to become more violent and hierarchical." This is research that HAS shown a link (habitat disruption to violence), directly contradicting "failed to reveal a link."Common trap: Reversed-truth trap ("has shown repeatedly" vs. "failed to reveal")
Comments
Loading comments…